Why do people deny evolution?

look closely at their postings

Now, I am no doctor, BUT, these are all signs of heavy narcissism.

It would be great if they would all put us on Ignore then we could chit-chat about them behind their backs.

Have you heard about microbial resistance setting to get us back to square one according to the World Health Organisation. An example of evolution in action as long as you ignore the artificial environment of antibiotics. It's as if the quacks have trained the little buggers to win the race. Thinking themselves masters of nature.

Like the horses that win the big races they are, essentially, crippled in terms of the evolved horse from which they were selectively bred by all manner of means which stud farms use to find a winner over distances from 5 furlongs to over 2 miles, on ground from firm to bottomless, on right or left hand tracks, at various times of the year, on a selection of nutrient regimes and a few other things no doubt.

I think we can learn a lot from stud farm procedures which, as you might know, are still a minority taste and confined mainly to the sophisticated circles as they call themselves in the papers and on TV.

It's the funniest thing about stud farm procedures that all the second rate colts are shot and any well bred filly doesn't really need to be any good herself.

The great problem with science, as Quantum Theory shows, is that the observer cannot get out of the way. The thing observed might not be influenced by being observed, as with a peep-hole in the netball changing room, but the perception of what is observed is most surely influenced by the observer. Hence science has a subjectivity problem which it cannot remove and cannot help but fly up its own arse once the sharing of the subjectivity becomes widespread, a religion, and too many people want in on the action and are prepared to sit in classrooms and listen to the likes of fm droning away about what a big deal he is, knowing all the while that failure in the exam is not an option because it would reflect badly upon the institution and be counter to its mandate which is to make everybody feel better about themselves.

God can handle as many people as there are getting in on the action but science can't. We are already in a situation where a young lady with a pipette putting two drops of something into 1000 test tubes arranged in banks, day after day, fancies herself a scientist.

A prominent scientist we have, a PhD no less, who explained the CERN project to the viewers once, was seen weeping, filling up, at an effin' sunset. And sunset is when the real action gets underway except for those mired in the comforts of domestic bliss.

whatever 'science' does, it is all wromg, but 'scientist' can't see that because they use only half of their brain!

we could agree that 'scientist' use more of their left then their 'right' brain,

Poor attempts at insult from Two very bitter interns whove probably flunked differential equations and are now blaming the system for thir shortcomings.I do know that spendi didn't make it through for a degree in chem ,if he pursued that at all)

proof that youre not rational is available from your previous posts. Ill let the readers decide.

YOU are the one whose called evolution hokum , but you've proposed no alternatives (other than a fair inkling at some Creationist pap).
No, the burden of proof is on you . If your not able to understand the repeatable nature of evidence out there, then I don't know what I can do further.
If ignorance is your desired state, you are well into your gradualte level of knowing nothing