Why do people deny evolution?

The designer obviously meant this software defined lifeform for temporary use only.

You are preprogrammed to die, get over it.

You are preprogrammed to die, get over it.


The body yes, not the personallity. We 'live' for ever.

So you say.

I became bored with your arguments the first time you refused to follow the argument surrounding what DNA and the architecture around it. Your defense of 'complexity' as a feature of naturally occurring chemical reactions has no basis in science.

This was from another thread but it is at the core of the argument:


I have asked you to account for the order of nucleotides necessary for a minimally complex organism via natural means. You have accounted for the possible transition from RNA to DNA, but not the original information in the RNA. You invoke 'archaea' as a magic spell and pretend that they explain it all.

You and others have stated that the increase in functional complexity is 'natural' but have no mechanism for it other than an accident of random chance. Gene doubling/duplication does nothing for functional complexity. Two copies of the same book gives no increase in 'information', let alone function.

By insisting that 'somehow the chemistry happened just so' is tantamount to ros's 'poofism'.

In what sense or form does the personality persist?

How your individually 'are' at the moment of 'death' will continue.
There is no 'death' in the sense that everything stops.
"Death' is just a transition.

Stugy e.g. the works of Elisabeth Kübler-Ross, and there is so much more, like NDE's etc etc.

I happen to think so too, I just wondered on what basis you did.

Sounds like you're happy with Ms. Kubler-Ross, et al as yours. I like a little more meat in my sandwhich.

dna is more a phone book, where one gene may be all "smith" . Are you mot aware of how nucleotides link??

There is sooooo much more material, including my own experiences.
Kubler Ross was just one example.

duh?

I'm long "over it." The thought of oblivion does not dismay me. It's only the god squad and a few nut bags that I see nattering on about surviving death. The more you attempt to forward a narrative about a designer, the more of an idiot-child your designer appears. You have not answered a single question I posed you, you just came in to make a typically snide remark precisely because you cannot answer the question.

Basically, ID and so many other forms of crypto-religious narratives that falsely claim a scientific basis are attempting to salvage the claim of a special relationship with their magic sky daddy. Even some of the creationists are willing to stipulate so-called micro-evolution, but the cling to their claim of a special creation for humans. Leaving aside the hilarious idiocy of claiming that such an intelligence would, in this vast cosmos, make a special effort on this little speck of dirt, orbiting a not very prepossessing star on the fringes of one of the billions of galaxies in the cosmos--the entire sequence makes your putative intelligence look like a kid playing with a stick in a mud puddle. That narrative is risible on the face of it. An un-guided, evolutionary process is a perfectly plausible narrative, for which there is a mountain of scientific evidence. Your alleged intelligent designer has ZERO evidence--and the same goes for the magic sky daddy (whom you are deceitfully denying--wait, was that a cock crowing I just heard?).

Your response assumes your premise in the other thread--sad, but not surprising.

See? You DO believe in magic...

https://www.yahoo.com/amphtml/news/apnewsbreak-80-000-people-died-flu-last-winter-193845195.html

Tell you what: those 80,000 people -- plus all those who got sick and recovered -- they did see evolution happen... The flue virus mutates regularly; that's the only way it can beat our immune system.

Yes, and if you wait long enough they turn in dogs and then in cats and then in ....humans!!!


lol, the stupidity of ev_th in a nutshell!

Small streams make big rivers.

yeahhhhh good analogy eh!! and some **** can make eyebalss, right?!

Man o man,

Well, you do have **** for brain, so why not **** for eyeballs?

Ohhhh the ad hominems again! Best sign of intellectual weakness, eh?!

Quote:’What kind of jackass designed the duck billed platypus? What kind of design flaw is our appendix? What was the design purpose of cholera, ebola, prions? Any alleged designer was a first class dickhead.’

What about the platypus or appendix?

Could not the existence of Ebola and such be evidence of a good loving intelligent designer creating a world without such things, yet because of sin, such things now exist.
In other words, Because of rebellious humans, which are the ‘dickheads.’ ( The problem which needs fixing) you and I.....Not The designer.

Does this interpretation cross your mind at all? do you suppose that you could be just denying it because you do not want to face the fact that you are ‘screwed up‘ ya know?

Again, it’s all about interpretation. You guys just continuously demonstrate how wrong and backward/opposite/mirror image you have nearly everything....like the’ old me.’
And this is why evolutionism is a great deception and illusion.

Says the guy who keeps calling everyone else stupid...