@Leadfoot,
Just between us. Im off to Williamsport for this day so Ill be abck around 4.
Im not enying the information contained as arranged chemicals in a genome.The argument I deny is that I see no evidence that these are "designed".
Might I begin with a simple comment.
The genome evolves by gene duplication or removal.I see that these events occur in several mean
Errors in rcombination
mutation
shufling of exxons
Genes becoming pseudogenes
retrotranscription
gene removal
changes in gene expression
When we look at these mechanisms, can you see how they are often responses to accidents,environmental stresses, or changes to the organisms way of life (eg organism becomes a parasite)
My argument will be to discuss and try to convince you that,beneath these above responses are REASONS that do not make a strong argument for a planning committee being in charge.
If we get into the development of genes from the get go, Im gonna have to respond by looking at the available research in print.
K?
see ya later
(PS, I will not strike out at many of those other folks who deny evolution, have identified an ID author, or JTT who just wants to have sex with me, for the time we are in discussion)
To set the positions up, you do NOT deny the mechanism of evolution as I paraphrased above, or natural selection. You accept that the earth is very old and you agree with findings of sciences discoveries (not necessarily the causation)