Why do people deny evolution?

running out of material eh? I gave you all of an East Coast night nd that was the best two arguments you could cobble?

Stick to the word games they require single dimensional thinking and only rely on recall, not reasoning.

How do you know that? Try them sometime. Let's see you on the Acronym test. You're barracking from the sidelines.

You're as bad as Apisa at marking your own exam papers. And with insults and ad homs.

What's a river or two in your area to evolution? You're employing provincialism.

You'll be saying goldfish swim in small circles after watching them in glass bowls. Evolution is not your cup of tea fm. It's funds. And the other thing of course. A heady combination.

Idid many times BOOOOOORING.
Maybe if you posed 3D word games where one dimension is love, the next is hate, and the third is something else (like food).
The "games" as is, have little point.

Not really. If you do true mathematics and not some fake creationist kind it works out just fine.

They have a point to me although I am aware that anything which has little point to you automatically, by internal logic, has little point scientifically.

I assume they have a point to all the others who have made room for them on A2K, and many other sites, started them and play at them.

Try an Acronym eh? Then we might see why you disparage word games. 20 half-decent acronyms is sufficient to demonstrate your agility of mind.

the Hardy Weinberg expansion has been around for almost 100 years and its still works.

ACRONYM.
Acronyms contain redolence of nimble "yardangish" minds

That doesn't count. I've seen it before.

I haven't so it does count. Only a rockhound or a farmer would use "yardang"

It jolly well doesn't you old fraud.

Acronyms contain remnants of newer Ypsilanti malmsey

That's not bad.

Acronyms contain remembrances of nimbly youthful matrons. Or neurotic or notionally or nondescript. Or Nemesis's muddled matrons.

Either way it's why people deny evolution.

people deny evolution because they are impressed by acronyms? Ill have to think about that more. Right now I have an urgent need for a haircut

You shouldn't cut your hair fm. Such an injurious treatment of body parts should only be undertaken from necessity. If thinking about my acronym has caused you to feel a haircut is necessary I am sorry. And besides it discourages your hair from growing.

I now prefer either concentrate, or compact or circumscribe to certain.

It is not at all that people deny evolution because they are impressed by acronyms. That acronym of mine, when decoded, gives poetically the reason why people deny evolution. And I'm sure it can be improved upon.

"Yeasty maidens" for example. It's a bit like getting three cherries on a fruit machine.

And it shows how an acronym might be used for such a sublime theme in one flash of insight.

Will Nemesis bring down vengeance on science for usurping enchantments and grinding them under its heel?

there is no proof of it and it is all a hoax.


that's all folks.

Being inorant is easy, merely shut off your brain, ignore science, and post drivvle about the world,
"Being tooo complicated out there to have risen naturally"

so you never done it, right?

I totally agree with the first sentence, I have studied evolution and a lot of anti-evolution.I have come to the conclusion that evolution is more of a religion then a 'science' because there is really no valid proof for evolution.
But I understand your reflex to defend this idiotic religion called 'evolution'
As I have stated before, it is just a hoax, a construct, made by the "Lunar Society" . if you don't believe me , just start researching,

You keep puking up claims like this. What evidence do you have for your claims? Why should anyone do your work for you? You do the research, and get back here with your evidence. Otherwise, people are justified in seeing you as a bullsh*t artist.