@AugustineBrother,
"repudiating " someone who made observations in the 1600's aint too hard. We love little Nickey Stensen but only because he, like LEonardo tried "thinking **** out". Experimentation is the nature of the game, not some piece of observational "truth".
Lots of geologists re wrong in their hypotheses but , I am sure, at least pretty sure, we dont go digging back 400 years to find something worth repudiating.
Hell, Ive got all kinds of problems with Punctuated equilibrium based on stratigraphy alone.
Also, look up Hjolstrums principles and youll find it makes observations on particle physics that are counterintuitive. (BUT experimentally fct)