132
   

Why do people deny evolution?

 
 
martinies
 
  1  
Sun 1 Nov, 2015 11:35 am
@martinies,
Why do people deny evolution. Answer because it seems to conflict with there religious beliefs. But it dosnt because if theres a god then that god must be relativity in the event. And relativity must have put dna in existance because without it dna could not have existed.
Quehoniaomath
 
  0  
Sun 1 Nov, 2015 12:46 pm
@martinies,
Quote:
Why do people deny evolution. Answer because it seems to conflict with there religious beliefs.



But it is not true! I have no religious axe to grind! I reject macro evolution , because there is not a shred of evidence for it. That is a very rational thing to do.
No evidence means wrong theory.
martinies
 
  1  
Sun 1 Nov, 2015 01:01 pm
@Quehoniaomath,
Is not that because the paths of macro evolution split away from each other at the very outset of life. For instance marsupials is a variation of the mammal line but in evolution terms recent.
Quehoniaomath
 
  1  
Sun 1 Nov, 2015 01:02 pm
@martinies,
Quote:
Is not that because the paths of macro evolution split away from each other at the very outset of life. For instance marsupials is a variation of the mammal line but in evolution terms recent.


what are you trying to say?
0 Replies
 
Briancrc
 
  2  
Sun 1 Nov, 2015 01:34 pm
@Quehoniaomath,
I found your YouTube video
https://youtu.be/-AS6rQtiEh8
martinies
 
  0  
Sun 1 Nov, 2015 01:50 pm
@martinies,
Groups split away relativity at an early stage in terms of genetics. So most of the big changes occurred early on much like the universal square law as you get further away from the source change decreases in scale. So the difference becomes less to the square of time passing so macro change lessens as you get away from the start piont.
McGentrix
 
  3  
Sun 1 Nov, 2015 04:09 pm
@Quehoniaomath,
Quehoniaomath wrote:

Quote:
He didn't invent microwave ovens. He applied the science that already existed into a different application.

Are you blind? Or is the stress of cognitive dissonance getting the better of you?
Here it is again, mate:
Quote:
THE MICROWAVE OVEN WAS INVENTED BY ACCIDENT BY A MAN WHO WAS ORPHANED AND NEVER FINISHED GRAMMAR SCHOOL

No applied science here mate! and no extremely stupid academian in site!
what a relief by the way! we won't miss those idiots.


Here is what really happened...
Quote:
Spencer then created the first true microwave oven by attaching a high density electromagnetic field generator to an enclosed metal box. The magnetron emitted microwaves into the metal box blocking any escape, allowing for controlled and safe experimentation.


Metal boxes already existed. Magnetrons already existed. Spencer did improve on the existing magnetrons while working at Raytheon.

So, Spencer took 2 already existing technologies and put them together because he observed that microwaves at certain frequencies heated up things. That is applied science in a nutshell. I am not sure why you are so fantastically outraged that science cannot be involved.

I bet you were picked on by some strange quarks as child. Is that it?
Quehoniaomath
 
  1  
Mon 2 Nov, 2015 12:08 am
@McGentrix,
Quote:
Metal boxes already existed. Magnetrons already existed. Spencer did improve on the existing magnetrons while working at Raytheon.

So, Spencer took 2 already existing technologies and put them together because he observed that microwaves at certain frequencies heated up things. That is applied science in a nutshell. I am not sure why you are so fantastically outraged that science cannot be involved.

I bet you were picked on by some strange quarks as child. Is that it?


So wrong you are.

Quote:
I am not sure why you are so fantastically outraged that science cannot be involved.


fantastically outraged??? I am not. Why did you make that up?

But I know 'modern science' can't invent a thing. because science is very simply very wrong.


Now, about your college indoctrination.....................


You are rather deeply indoctrinated by it. so I see. Pity, but to be expected.


btw what college did you went to?
0 Replies
 
Quehoniaomath
 
  1  
Mon 2 Nov, 2015 12:27 am
@McGentrix,
Quote:
I bet you were picked on by some strange quarks as child. Is that it?


Why the extremely cheap ad hominem, mate? something I wrote?

Believe me, I understand you want to cling to your science religion, you have probably invested a lot in these nonsense.

You probably also believe that the transistor was invented in Bell's Lab's

well, it wasn't. Just again a lonely inventor much smarter then most scientists today,

I say it again, 'modern science' is not capable of anything, hence they steal ALL the inventions of the past and show them off as if they are theirs.

It is just cheap theft. Nothing more, nothing less.
Quehoniaomath
 
  1  
Mon 2 Nov, 2015 12:30 am
@Briancrc,
Quote:
I found your YouTube video


If you are implying I am creationist, you haven't read all my postings , because I am not,

Furtermore, this is just an ad hominem, and you don't adress the issues or come up with any argument. Can't you or won't you?
martinies
 
  1  
Mon 2 Nov, 2015 12:31 am
@martinies,
Relativity does not move but it relativity causes the change and movement in moving and changing things.What then caused relativity to exist. Nonlocality or tao the nonmoving thing. What is the cause of change in the event the answer has to be tao as relativity.
0 Replies
 
McGentrix
 
  1  
Mon 2 Nov, 2015 07:26 am
@Quehoniaomath,
Quehoniaomath wrote:

Quote:
I bet you were picked on by some strange quarks as child. Is that it?


Why the extremely cheap ad hominem, mate? something I wrote?

Believe me, I understand you want to cling to your science religion, you have probably invested a lot in these nonsense.

You probably also believe that the transistor was invented in Bell's Lab's

well, it wasn't. Just again a lonely inventor much smarter then most scientists today,

I say it again, 'modern science' is not capable of anything, hence they steal ALL the inventions of the past and show them off as if they are theirs.

It is just cheap theft. Nothing more, nothing less.


You didn't like my little physics joke? Crying or Very sad
izzythepush
 
  0  
Mon 2 Nov, 2015 07:31 am
@McGentrix,
McGentrix wrote:

You didn't like my little physics joke? Crying or Very sad



Not enough charm.
FBM
 
  1  
Mon 2 Nov, 2015 07:45 am
@izzythepush,
Or flavor.
0 Replies
 
Setanta
 
  1  
Mon 2 Nov, 2015 08:08 am
Plenty of strangeness, though . . .
Quehoniaomath
 
  1  
Mon 2 Nov, 2015 08:08 am
@McGentrix,
Quote:
You didn't like my little physics joke?


too cheap, mate,too cheap.

Now how about some solid arguments? How about answering my questions about your indoctrination at college? Come'on, mate.

You can do better then this. Or can you?
0 Replies
 
Quehoniaomath
 
  1  
Mon 2 Nov, 2015 08:16 am
@Setanta,
Quote:
Plenty of strangeness, though . . .


what is?
0 Replies
 
izzythepush
 
  0  
Mon 2 Nov, 2015 08:20 am
martinies
 
  1  
Mon 2 Nov, 2015 09:31 am
@izzythepush,
A very relative piece of music.
0 Replies
 
Quehoniaomath
 
  0  
Tue 3 Nov, 2015 12:18 am
@izzythepush,
do you believe this blindly?
 

Related Topics

 
Copyright © 2024 MadLab, LLC :: Terms of Service :: Privacy Policy :: Page generated in 1.13 seconds on 12/28/2024 at 01:41:28