Why do people deny evolution?

I think the probability wave in quantum mechanics should realy be called a relative structure wave or a wave of possible structure in terms of left or right. The relativity between left and right or spin up spin down must be the cause. Nonlocality is the cause of left and right and seen as relativity in left right locality. Nolocality without action is left without a right or alternatively right without a left. Locality is nonlocality as a coincidence of right and left.

To sum up locality is the relativity between right and left and the relativity between right and left is nolocality.

The relativity in the geometery of right and left is nonlocality.

If god then is nonlocality then god as the relativity between clockwise and anticlockwise caused DNA to have an anti clockwise double helix. So did god as the relativity between clockwise and anti clockwise then affect the structure of DNA giving cause to the coincedents of an anticlockwise double helix. Even if it where the effects of say the earths spin to affect the clockwise choice for the dna helix that would still be relativity causing an out come of either clockwise of anticlockwise.

Tao or god(love)=NONLOCALITY = relativity in the created local illusion = the relativity inside and outside of the DNA structure coincedents creating an anti clockwise double helix. Consciousness being relativity of nonlocality to the event taking place inside it.

This page looked so lonely with 5 'user ignored'.

So, another theory:

Evolution is matter of left or right disscisions taken by nature with relativity as its guide.

Stories taken out of the context they where made up for to convey there relative meaning. Noah was probably a marsh arab in what is now iraq and took a few farm animals on a boat for the duration of a tidal surge from the persian gulf.

All we need to prove evoutiiiiiiiiiioooooooooooooonnnnnnnnn is E.V.I.D.E.N.C.E.

There very simply is none

Relativness in the event evolves life forms. Relativness is love. Love is god. The syncranisity in dna caused an anti clockwise double helix in the dna coincedents to exist as it does.

Aren't you over working the word 'relative' and its derivatives?

No because its the whole story. Look at the natural world its all a presentation of unmoving relativity. The event is the film and relativeness projects the event like a film. The unmoving thing nonlocality projects the changing local thing in the guise of relativeness. Relativness is love the same love jesus n buhdda where going on about. There is relativeness in every aspect of the natural world. A fish relates to water and water relates to earth and eath relates to a cat and the cat relates to a fish by eating it. Gravity is the relitiveness of timespace to mass. Expansion is relativeness qm is relativeness.

It's still just gibberish

Read what jesus teaches and use the word relitveness and god with the same meaning. The holy spirit is relativeness or it dosnt mean anything. The holy spirit moves an creates all things and that means it the holy spirit as nonlocality moves and creates things in a relative way. Einstiens theorys and ideas on the geometry of spacetime are indistinguishably from the simple relativeness in chemistry in that they relate locality to nonlocality by relativity. God made man in his own image and consciousness as open relativity is that image. A chemical action is an action like any other action in that it has relativeness . Dna is a chemical action in a coincedents and the relativity in that action chose an anticlockwise double helix for the structure of the Dna.

Its STILL just gibberish.

Ok chaos theory with relativity as the order in the chaos. So we have moving and changing chaos with unmoving relativeness giving order and out comes. One outcome is the double anticlockwise helix in dna. Unmoving relativity caused that outcome in the chaos of the event. The relative thing caused our selves as individuals to exist the way we do localy by nonlocal design.

Nonlocality + the bigbang = locality + relativeness. So the relativeness in locality = nonlocality.

Would you believe 2+2=4 I wonder. 2+2 relates as 4.