Why do people deny evolution?

@hingehead,

Cant see how dna contradicts religious beliefs. Please explain.

0 Replies

@hingehead,

Pray tell me why dna should not be considered religious.

and waiting and waiting and waiting.

please let me know when the evidence is coming in for evolution. those idiots are getting boring and don't deliver any goodiees. Not at all!

1 Reply

@Quehoniaomath,

In my reference frame evolution and creation are both true. In your reference frame only creation is true. In others reference frames only evolution is true. Which if any is the correct frame of reference for evolution.

1 Reply

@martinies,

what that says to me is that you understand neither

2 Replies

@martinies,

From my perspective, dna, nature, life and death, etc. provide the substances of religion experience. But Gods, angels, otherworldly places do not.

0 Replies

@farmerman,

What it means is from your refence frame you some how see evolution as having no guiding influence.

2 Replies

@martinies,

Death is a fictional force for change on life forms. The fictional force of death is not a local force but acts on the local event to change life forms.

2 Replies

@farmerman,

Death or religion is a fiction force in your ref frame.

0 Replies

@martinies,

martinies wrote:

Death is a fictional force for change on life forms. The fictional force of death is not a local force but acts on the local event to change life forms.

Is that dogma of some sort?

And if so...what does it mean?

0 Replies

@martinies,

martinies wrote:

The fictional force of death is not a local force

Of course it's not, it's just another way of hiking up the phone costs, first my bank and now death. Will it never end?

0 Replies

@martinies,

Quote:

you some how see evolution as having no guiding influence

not somehow, but completely

2 Replies

@farmerman,

There seems to be a direction in evolution and that is the tendancy to the evolution of more awareness in consciousness.

4 Replies

@martinies,

"really"? and you know this how?

Evolution is ssemingly unaware whether organisms become more or less simplified.
There are entire genera of nnelids and crustaceans that are evolving to simple phenotypes as a kind of sexual dimorphism.
(The males have evolved to become " appendages" of a female)

0 Replies

@martinies,

Its as if death has a tendancy to produce by evolution a lifeform that it death can self realise in. That life form being man. The fictional force of death produces a life form to express its self physically.

0 Replies

@martinies,

Its as if death has a tendancy to produce by evolution a lifeform that it death can self realise in. That life form being man. The fictional force of death produces a life form to express its self physically.

0 Replies

@martinies,

Its as if death has a tendancy to produce by evolution a lifeform that it death can self realise in. That life form being man. The fictional force of death produces a life form to express its self physically.

0 Replies

@farmerman,

The fictional force of death has a tendency to produce a life form which can self realise its self as being death or beond death as death.

1 Reply

@martinies,

martinies wrote:

The fictional force of death has a tendency to produce a life form which can self realise its self as being death or beond death as death.

What in the world is that supposed to mean?

2 Replies

@Frank Apisa,

martinies wrote:

The fictional force of death has a tendency to produce a life form which can self realise its self as being death or beond death as death.

Frank wrote:

What in the world is that supposed to mean?

I believe he may be referring to this phenomenon:

Quote:

. . . The worms crawl in, the worms crawl out the worms play pinochle on your snout . .

1 Reply

Why do people deny evolution?

Related Topics

Quick Links

My Account

able2know