No that is not the answer either, so your clueless streak, is still in tact.
0 Replies
DNA Thumbs drive
-1
Tue 30 Dec, 2014 05:00 pm
@FBM,
Thesis are not posted here, unless you are attending the wonderamma school of Crayola.
0 Replies
parados
1
Wed 31 Dec, 2014 11:00 am
@Herald,
Molecules create compounds based on energy. You might want to look outside on a day that isn't cloudy to see if you can spot an energy source. Let us know what you find.
0 Replies
parados
1
Wed 31 Dec, 2014 11:01 am
@DNA Thumbs drive,
You continue to argue that computer code is millions of lines long. You don't know the first thing about code. Maybe you should tell us how many lines of code are in a "Hello World" program.
0 Replies
Setanta
0
Wed 31 Dec, 2014 12:47 pm
Thumby's obsession with DNA arises from his version of irreducible complexity--that DNA could not arise through natural means, and that therefore there must be a designer. Like most opponents of evolution online, he's learned to avoid the issue of who or what the designer is.
0 Replies
Olivier5
1
Wed 31 Dec, 2014 01:26 pm
@parados,
Quote:
The following is computer code and does nothing but it is code.
00000000
00000000
00000000
There's in fact a lot of 'non-coding' DNA in our genome, and nobody knows why...
That is because no one knows how DNA codes in the first place. The junk DNA, might be the most important part, heck this DNA might even hold the diagrams, for how to build DNA in the first place. No one knows.
That is because no one knows how DNA codes in the first place. The junk DNA, might be the most important part, heck this DNA might even hold the diagrams, for how to build DNA in the first place. No one knows.
And I still say, DNA is an antenna! it can also explain the junk -DNA
I think that all the experimentation here shows, is that DNA is effected by EMF, and not that the DNA is in fact an antenna. All parts of all living organisms, are effected by various types of radiation, this is hardly new.
I think that all the experimentation here shows, is that DNA is effected by EMF, and not that the DNA is in fact an antenna. All parts of all living organisms, are effected by various types of radiation, this is hardly new.
We are so fortunate to be overhearing a scholarly discussion between our two resident "geniuses" about whther DNA is an "antenna" or not.
Lets lissen in.
