132
   

Why do people deny evolution?

 
 
Quehoniaomath
 
  -1  
Fri 12 Dec, 2014 09:26 am
@farmerman,
Quote:
I note that Thumbsy has not entered anything ina profile, and he feels entitled ?

Anyway, my comments were originally to Quahog who made the comment that"Statistics proves that evolution is impossible"
Notice he just slipped away after that statement.

Statistics proves that bumblebees cant fly also.




Nope you are wrong, the bumblebee has to do with physics, mate.
not statistics.
See, you don't get it.

And you even can't pinpoint where the statistics is wrong.

Too diificult eh?


it is all in your mind and no were else!

Btw you will never get the fact that evolution is extremely untrue, because you have taught this shite for years!!!


Never mind how good the arguments and the logic and the rational against extreme stupidity of evolution, you will never be able to see it, You really are too deep into denial.


pity, but that is the way it is.

ehBeth
 
  1  
Fri 12 Dec, 2014 09:36 am
@DNA Thumbs drive,
DNA Thumbs drive wrote:
All I ask is what University were you a professor at?


what is your home address?

seriously

farmerman
 
  2  
Fri 12 Dec, 2014 09:36 am
@Quehoniaomath,
Its your soapbox Quahog not mine. You made the statement that statistics proves that evolution is impossible. Then you insulted me to say I don't understand statistics and I then I imply that Ive got lots of experience and I even taught it as an applied tool for economic geology.

In a means to avoid the discussion of your initial statement you've gone on an attack mode to try to turn the table around to make me try to make your argument and I readily admit I cannot.

NOT SO FAST Quahog.
Im waiting for your Nobel Prize award speech that explains the statistics behind your statement.

MAybe you can show us in your Vagueic Math.
parados
 
  2  
Fri 12 Dec, 2014 09:41 am
@Quehoniaomath,
It has been pinpointed where your statistics are wrong.

You finally posted how you do your statistics here:
http://able2know.org/topic/229102-165#post-5789113

Anyone with a simple understanding of statistics will spot your error. Your claim would mean that the more people that play the lottery the less likely it is that someone would win.

Your problem is you realize you can't add probability so you assume you can just multiple the odds of winning. That is wrong.
0 Replies
 
Quehoniaomath
 
  -1  
Fri 12 Dec, 2014 09:51 am
@farmerman,
Quote:
Its your soapbox Quahog not mine. You made the statement that statistics proves that evolution is impossible. Then you insulted me to say I don't understand statistics and I then I imply that Ive got lots of experience and I even taught it as an applied tool for economic geology.

In a means to avoid the discussion of your initial statement you've gone on an attack mode to try to turn the table around to make me try to make your argument and I readily admit I cannot.

NOT SO FAST Quahog.
Im waiting for your Nobel Prize award speech that explains the statistics behind your statement.

MAybe you can show us in your Vagueic Math.



yep, see, you don't get it. I told you so.

Sorry, mate , I really can't take your bullshit seriously because of your background that hinders you to comprehend very simple logic.
InkRune
 
  2  
Fri 12 Dec, 2014 10:56 am
@Quehoniaomath,
Oh my god, way too much ad hominem
rosborne979
 
  4  
Fri 12 Dec, 2014 11:06 am
Lately I've begun to wonder if someone has finally invented the "Troll-Bot".

A simple Bot that denies everything, tells others they don't get it, provides nothing except cut-and-paste images/text, and repeats the process over and over again.
Quehoniaomath
 
  -1  
Fri 12 Dec, 2014 11:35 am
@InkRune,
Quote:
Oh my god, way too much ad hominem


Nope, I really mean it. People who have been professor can't think straight anymore. I don't think FM is reallt stupid, but he sure is made very stupid.

So, now we are talking facts.
0 Replies
 
Quehoniaomath
 
  -1  
Fri 12 Dec, 2014 11:37 am
@rosborne979,
Quote:
A simple Bot that denies everything, tells others they don't get it, provides nothing except cut-and-paste images/text, and repeats the process over and over again.


So, in fact you are saying you have no arguments?


Figures.

maybe come back with some later, mate!


I know I know.
0 Replies
 
Quehoniaomath
 
  -1  
Fri 12 Dec, 2014 11:43 am
Now let's continue this fascinating discussion!

So, people who are indoctrinated into this evolution shite, have blinders on and
can't see the Emperor has No Clothes!

So, the 'other' people who can clearly see that the Emperor is naked,
(that is evolution is bullshit, shite and bollocks), are most of the time flabbergasted by the religious evolutionst fundamentalists who follow their religion to the letter.
Those evolutionists religious are so full of Dogma , and at the same time think they are not, and that makes it very funny to wachjt them squirm or get into a rage anytime someone attacks their holy religion.


It is funny in a way and sad to see the same time how deeply these religious evolutionsts nust are programmed into their cult.


But, if someone really looks at it all, it is soooo easy to see that the whole evolution thing is full of shite!!!



Ah well....


0 Replies
 
Olivier5
 
  1  
Fri 12 Dec, 2014 12:11 pm
@FBM,
Cheap shots. The Catholic Church has supported evolution theory for about a century. That's good behaviour which should be encouraged. Also, the author unscientifically assumes that God wasn't involved in the big bang. There isn't a shred of evidence for that and there never will be. It's pure metaphysics.
DNA Thumbs drive
 
  -1  
Fri 12 Dec, 2014 03:46 pm
@ehBeth,
Look, if I am online with a distinguished professor from a distinguished university, I would like to know what the university is. Then again, the list of professors who use language like this

Quote:
I taught applied geostatistics and mining Kriging and Trend SUrface Analyses for about 8 years in university. You, I believe, gain all your "expertise" from looking up your ass.


My guess, is not Harvard, or Yale, or Cambridge, or Cornell, in fact the above, would not pass eighth grade English in any school in the World.
timur
 
  3  
Fri 12 Dec, 2014 03:50 pm
DNA dumb driver wrote:
in fact the above, would not pass eighth grade English in any school in the World.


This from a guy that doesn't know the difference between right and rite.

A guy that doesn't know the proper use of an apostrophe.
DNA Thumbs drive
 
  -1  
Fri 12 Dec, 2014 03:57 pm
@timur,
As I recall, you are the guy who never heard of DNA hard drives. Well at least you are out of the cave now, I think?
izzythepush
 
  1  
Fri 12 Dec, 2014 03:59 pm
@DNA Thumbs drive,
Then you should have to tell us which particular troop of baboons you hail from.

0 Replies
 
timur
 
  3  
Fri 12 Dec, 2014 04:04 pm
@DNA Thumbs drive,
Oh, the hypocrite!

You posted a crappy riddle I showed you was worth ****.

You cannot even comprehend what a hard drive is..
DNA Thumbs drive
 
  0  
Fri 12 Dec, 2014 04:06 pm
@timur,
I build computers son...... Try again.
timur
 
  3  
Fri 12 Dec, 2014 04:10 pm
@DNA Thumbs drive,
The irony!

DNA is hardly hard..

Your computers are certainly crap compared to mine.

In addition, you don't know how to talk to them..
DNA Thumbs drive
 
  0  
Fri 12 Dec, 2014 04:14 pm
@timur,
Well my i7-3930K processor is a little bit old, but it's 6 dual channel cores all running at 3.2GHz, that my operating system reads as 12 cores, usually suffices.

https://www.cpubenchmark.net/high_end_cpus.html
timur
 
  2  
Fri 12 Dec, 2014 04:18 pm
@DNA Thumbs drive,
Ah! I knew you were in the little league..

Do you know what it takes to make a meteorological model to function?

Or to process the data of one million people?

Give me a break..
 

Related Topics

 
Copyright © 2025 MadLab, LLC :: Terms of Service :: Privacy Policy :: Page generated in 0.08 seconds on 01/15/2025 at 10:16:03