Why do people deny evolution?

@Quehoniaomath,

Quote:

Only evidence , of which there is none, does!!

Oh, you mean like your god. LOL

0 Replies

@Olivier5,

Quote:

Ok so you have no clue how all these species came into being. Thanks for clarifying that.

No clue? Of course I know he theory! I was brought up with this nonsense.

Quote:

And what makes you think evolution is NOT part of the explanation?

Pleaaaasee , mate!!!! Read my above postings!!!

I have just state at least the 3 reasons!!!

AND PLEASE RED NEXT TIME BEFORE YOU ANSWER, THANK YOU!!!!

This isn't easy for you, right?!

1 Reply

@sonichell,

There is a paper by King and Shubin that questions the "tetrapod" hypothesis of the earlier Devonian "Trackways" as reported by the Polish paleo team. king has done trackway studies in intertidal waters and mudflats by Sarcopterygian fishes (lungfish etc) and has seen very similar trackways as those in the Polish paper.
So, we may have an example of how controversy in science is settled (by more data and convincing evidence)

Should the polish tetrapod be real (Of which they only had these hole like "trackways" and no specimen), whereas , with Tiktaalik, they have a specimen AND tracks (with similar indentations in the fluvial bottoms, the Polish tracks would set back a transitional form by about 10 million years. Not a real big deal but something worth settling so science can proceed with other stuff.

0 Replies

ohhh she (fm) is trying to come to the rescue.

funny, funny, funny.

But she is in ignore, again!

0 Replies

@Quehoniaomath,

Would you mind listing these three reasons for me? I am curious about why would anyone reject a plausible theory in favour of no theory at all. What is it that really bugs you in evolution?

1 Reply

@Olivier5,

Quote:

Would you mind listing these three reasons for me?

I DID A FEW POSTINGS BACK MATE!!! READ THAT POSTING!!!

Quote:

I am curious about why would anyone reject a plausible theory in favour of no theory at all. What is it that really bugs you in evolution?

You really mean that question, don't you?

Plausible?? that we we are made from some rocks and soup and then over billion of years speciies wee formed??? Plausible?? Plausible???? Gives me a laugh!!

bugs me? It isn't about that, mate. You really don't get it, do you???

Evolution THEORY lacks any evidence!!!

THE EMPEROR HAS NO CLOTHES

That is all!!!!

where is this dude coming from??????

1 Reply

@Quehoniaomath,

Time is precious my end. If you have something to say about why evolution is not possible, say it. Or you can continue to say nothing, but then you have:

- no alternative theory
- no evidence, and
- no reason to reject evolution.

1 Reply

@Olivier5,

Quote:

Time is precious my end. If you have something to say about why evolution is not possible, say it.

ARE YOU BLIND????????????????? I STATED THAT A FEW POSTINGS AGO, MATE! WHAT ABOUT MY TIME?!

READ IT!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Quote:

- no alternative theory

Oh mye Oh mye. I don't need an alternative theory mate!!!
Do you even know what 'science' is??????

Quote:

- no evidence, and

for what mate????????????????????????????????????????????????
I dont have to proof anything!!!
EVOLUTION THEORISTS DO!!

Quote:

- no reason to reject evolution.

Are you blind?????????????????????????????????????

read my ******* postings from JUST TODAY!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!1

btw you ******* annoying -> ignore!

Thank you and have a nice day!

1 Reply

@Quehoniaomath,

LOL. Quehog put me on ignore... That's a badge of honor. :-)

2 Replies

@cicerone imposter,

cicerone imposter wrote:

As explained many times before, fossils survive depending on its environment.
Brand that into your brain - if that's possible. Most living things after they die deteriorate; some trees even become stones over time. Survival of sequential fossils are not meant to provide 'you' with evidence for evolution. Enough fossils supported by DNA remain for scientists to arrive at theories about evolutionary transitions. It's for you to provide evidence that their theories are wrong by providing evidence to the contrary.

ANSWER THIS ONE QUESTION; PROVE YOUR GOD EXISTS.

Given the difficulty in establishing outright proof, I'd be satisfied with just a little evidence that we could compare to the mountains of evidence for evolution and see how it stacks up.

0 Replies

@Olivier5,

Olivier5 wrote:

LOL. Quehog put me on ignore... That's a badge of honor. :-)

I was put on ignore a long time ago...come on over red rover.

1 Reply

@Germlat,

Yes my mistress...

1 Reply

@Olivier5,

If the title is meant for me...I accept...

0 Replies

@Olivier5,

He put me on ignore but still responds to my posts.

2 Replies

@izzythepush,

Maybe an angel tells him when it's important enough to respond to...

1 Reply

@FBM,

Quote:

Maybe an angel tells him when it's important enough to respond to...

Hmm you don't read my postings either! I don't use god, angels or whatever.

However, it seems you must assume that, else you will get lost! Wink

1 Reply

@Quehoniaomath,

Quehoniaomath wrote:

Hmm you don't read my postings either!

Don't be surprised, read one you've read them all. Never mind, you can always pray to your Messiah.

http://merovee.files.wordpress.com/2011/11/sun.jpg

1 Reply

@izzythepush,

Icke says he's the new messiah. Who woulda thunk?

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YwMNINWcy-A

2 Replies

@izzythepush,

I was the first he put on ignore but he frequently addresses me when Ive tweaked his idiocy. He used a line from Dylan a while back which make me think its spendi on holiday from reality.

1 Reply

@Builder,

it is....he SAID not SAYS.

and...it is out of context.

Now, what are you trying to say? That he is wrong because he said, that?

That is extremely stupid, isn'' t it?

0 Replies

Why do people deny evolution?

Related Topics

Quick Links

My Account

able2know