@FBM,
why can't you be more critical and just link only some nonsense?
they are soooo wrong.
E.g:
Quote:Genetic commonalities. Human beings have approximately 96% of genes in common with chimpanzees, about 90% of genes in common with cats (source), 80% with cows (source), 75% with mice (source), and so on. This does not prove that we evolved from chimpanzees or cats, though, only that we shared a common ancestor in the past. And the amount of difference between our genomes corresponds to how long ago our genetic lines diverged.
My o my, I thought it was talked about a lot here al ready!
this is sheer nonsense, and you know why? It isn't mentioned here, but sometimes there is greater deviation in the same species!!!!
e.g. a crocdille and a snake (reptiles) , if I recall correctly, has more difference in their genes than between two other species!
The evidence here is very selective!
Another one:
Quote: Bacterial resistance to antibiotics. Bacteria colonies can only build up a resistance to antibiotics through evolution. It is important to note that in every colony of bacteria, there are a tiny few individuals which are naturally resistant to certain antibiotics. This is because of the random nature of mutations.
So, this is no evidence at all!
I have stated a few times that there IS micro evolution! You really don't read the posting. This here is an example of micro evoluton and I am not rejecting micro evolution at all
Bit it is not macro evolution.
So, this is no evidence at all!
Quote:The fossil record. The fossil record shows that the simplest fossils will be found in the oldest rocks, and it can also show a smooth and gradual transition from one form of life to another.
please not again! And talking about fossils, please, please, please show me some intermediate fossils, I am asking for these all the time.
But the evolutionistst can't deliver!
So, this is no evidence at all!
Quote:When an antibiotic is applied, the initial innoculation will kill most bacteria, leaving behind only those few cells which happen to have the mutations necessary to resist the antibiotics. In subsequent generations, the resistant bacteria reproduce, forming a new colony where every member is resistant to the antibiotic. This is natural selection in action. The antibiotic is "selecting" for organisms which are resistant, and killing any that are no
But no information is added!!!!
So, this is no evidence at all!