I am suggesting that the quest for a ToE (Theory of Everything) is futile and that all we can expect is continued expansion of our prediction and control practices.
Well, some people do that, Fresco. I've heard people claim, for instance, that it is impossible to know if there is a GOD...when such a claim is almost self-contradictory. IF
there is a GOD...the GOD, should IT choose, could easily devise a way to unambiguously reveal ITS existence to humans. So it truly is not impossible.
I suspect that "A theory of everything" is not an impossibility (hence not "futile")...and that it simply is beyond the limits of HUMAN comprehension. That is the reason I take the position with regard to REALITY that I do.
In any case, I truly doubt that the "limits of my language are the limits of my world." Almost certainly there is "world" outside the limits of my language...and in fact, there are speculations about the "world" outside the limits of my language.
I cannot put into language what my mind sometimes grapples with when considering the concept "nothingness" or "infinity"...but that does not mean those things do not exist.
I am willing, however, to acknowledge that “the limits of MY language” prevent me from better expressing what I meant when I wrote: “There is a great deal more to why the true nature of the REALITY of existence is not "available" to us than the difficulties with language.” (I also acknowledge that rather than the second word in that sentence being “is”…I think I should have used, “…appears to be….”)