Intelligent Design vs. Casino Universe

Why don't you simply answer the question?

Because your red herring demand is unreasonable. You really think I'm going to dig through 200 pages of your crap and collect all your logical fallacies, then try once again to teach you about them? You didn't learn the first few dozen times; I don't see any reason to expect that you've suddenly become intellectually capable or honest. It's all moot, anyway, since you've admitted defeat and given up the alien/ILF/god-thingy-of-the-gaps claim. If you're so interested, look it up yourself. I don't give a rat's ass.

     So am I in terms of your crap. Will you be intellectually honest enough to say that you don't even understand the question about the Time? Will you be intellectually honest to say openly that you don't have the vaguest idea of what does gaps mean ... in your broken record of references and claims 'whatever of the gaps'? What is the definition of 'gaps' in that claim?

Who gives a ****, except you? If you're not defending the alien/ILF/god-thingy-of-the-gaps claim, I couldn't care less about whether or not you comprehend your logical failings.

     This is not a claim. This is a hypothesis, a hypothetical situation, a set of possible case scenarios ... about the assumptions of the Big Bang/God/something else creating the Universe (if it has not always existed).
     Where is the claim? You simply don't understand something. The real claim is that before the Big Bang there might have existed several possibilities for the assumptions - but they are unknowable, for you cannot infer on backtrack the assumptions and after that to justify your straight inference on the grounds of the very same assumptions. This is as if to raise yourself by catching you with the hand to the hair. Physics does not work that way, space does not work that way and time does not work that way.

Is that the reading of your own B.S. in connection with the 'whatever of the gaps' and 'aliens of the gaps' ... repeated to infinity in the form of a 'question' ... without having the vaguest idea of what the Gaps are? What is your definition of Gaps in the context of the metaphor that you are using to infinity like a broken record? When will we have the listing with your enumeration of the Gaps ... in the context of your own fake claim?

When it becomes relevant again. Until then, do your own work. You won't be leeching off me.

     Let's have a deal: either you enumerate the Gaps and specify them in details, and give some definition of the Gaps in the context of your quotes and references, and we continue to discuss your construct 'whatever of the Gaps', or you simply confess that you can't make that list for life and that you don't have a definition of the Gaps, in which case we, and especially you, forget about the 'aliens of the Gaps' on the grounds of missing key information ... in the formulation of the claim.

Nah. Reckon not. Do your own thread-diving. You should've been paying attention the first time. Are you reviving your alien/ILF/god-thingy-of-the-gaps? It sure sounds like you're headed that way...

     As you say so.

Ah. Game's back on, then. Where's your evidence for that alien/ILF/god-thingy? Hint: according to logic, no such evidence can exist in any incompleteness in the current standard models. You need genuine observational and/or experimental data. Let's see what you've got.

     You are a sick mind, you know. Besides that if you are the mastermind of the aliens - the alien-in-chief, as you have presented yourself 100 pages ago on this thread, why are you so desperately looking for evidence ... of your own existence. Why is that such a great problem to you?

You said you believe in some sort of 45%/30%/25% alien/ILF/god-thingy mish-mash of self-contradictory crap as an explanation for the observable universe. Where's your evidence for it?

You were told what you were told ... and nothing else will be told to you unless you specify the Gaps, without the definition and specification of which your strawman of the gaps collapses like a house of cards.

So you continue to make the claim without supporting evidence. Therefore, you continue to be considered an illogical, pseudo-intellectual wingnut. You can change that by presenting evidence for your claim.

What is the idea of poisoning with vitriol and plugging all the threads ... with your retarded strawman of the gaps?

What is the idea of poisoning with denialism and plugging the forum with your fallacious alien/ILF/god-thingy claim, while having zero evidence to support your claim?