32
   

Intelligent Design vs. Casino Universe

 
 
Herald
 
  1  
Reply Thu 21 May, 2015 09:19 pm
@FBM,
FBM wrote:
What is the idea of poisoning with denialism and plugging the forum with your fallacious alien/ILF/god-thingy claim.
     This is not true. I posted the hypothetical scenario only once and you published it 200 times after that until you shaped it after your image and resemblance - a strawman of the gaps.
FBM
 
  0  
Reply Thu 21 May, 2015 09:20 pm
@Herald,
Herald wrote:

FBM wrote:
What is the idea of poisoning with denialism and plugging the forum with your fallacious alien/ILF/god-thingy claim.
     This is not true. I posted the hypothetical scenario only once and you published it 200 times after that until you shaped it after your image and resemblance - a strawman of the gaps.


Pro tip: It's not a stawman if it's your exact words. Wink
0 Replies
 
FBM
 
  0  
Reply Thu 21 May, 2015 09:36 pm
@Herald,
Herald wrote:

...I posted the hypothetical scenario only once...


You didn't say anything about it being hypothetical at the time that I quoted your exact words in proper context. Now you seem ashamed of it. Are you going back to disowning it? Make up your mind.

http://i206.photobucket.com/albums/bb192/DinahFyre/xenu981205072.gif
Herald
 
  1  
Reply Thu 21 May, 2015 09:50 pm
@FBM,
FBM wrote:
You didn't say anything about it being hypothetical at the time that I quoted your exact words in proper context.
     Now, when you were told perhaps you will stop quoting it.
FBM
 
  0  
Reply Thu 21 May, 2015 09:56 pm
@Herald,
Maybe not. Not until you openly disown it and acknowledge that it's 100% bullshit. Until then, you're still defending it.
Herald
 
  1  
Reply Thu 21 May, 2015 10:06 pm
@FBM,
FBM wrote:
Maybe not. Not until you openly disown it and acknowledge that it's 100% bullshit. Until then, you're still defending it.
     This is your misinterpretation of my suggested understanding, but it is not actually that case.
0 Replies
 
FBM
 
  1  
Reply Thu 21 May, 2015 11:56 pm
@FBM,
Herald wrote:

... my personal are God or some meta-intelligence (string theory) or s.th.; 30% another ILF, sending the designs on the Earth even through some form of teleportation or another form of encoded communication (it might have extinct already by the time the information has came here), and perhaps 25% of the Big Bang and the theory that we are made out of star dust (whatever this might mean) and fused with the time by the Dark Energy and Dark Matter....


Defend that, if you can. You might consider re-disowning it, seeing as you're logically self-contradictory, don't even understand most of the basic concepts you name and have zero evidence to support any of it.

Herald
 
  1  
Reply Fri 22 May, 2015 08:59 pm
@FBM,
FBM wrote:
Defend that, if you can.
     1. The phenomenology in the quantum mechanics and the phenomenology in the pyrhotechnics of philosophy (your major) are very much different as concepts.
     2. The understanding of beliefs in the math logic and the misunderstanding of beliefs in the pyrhotechnics of philosophy (your major) are very much different as concepts.
     3. Unless you give the formal definition of the Gaps, and enumerate them item-by-item, I cannot unfortunately tell you anything on your personal problems with the aliens. I cannot comment your cross-cultural misunderstanding of the Gaps .. as you are not stating them explicitly.
     4. As far as the quote is concerned, these believes are temporary and exemplary ... and super personal, if true. They are not supposed to be defended in any case scenario before any retards & fans of phenomenology in the pyrhotechnics of philosophy.
FBM
 
  0  
Reply Fri 22 May, 2015 09:03 pm
@Herald,
blah blah word salad blah blah argumentum ad ignorantiam blah blah red herrings blah blah blah.

Got any evidence to support your magically invisible and earth-design teleporting alien/ILF/god-thingy-of-the-gaps?
Herald
 
  1  
Reply Fri 22 May, 2015 09:11 pm
@FBM,
FBM wrote:
Got any evidence to support your.
     There may be a lot of evidence ... for those who can see it. Unfortunately you will not be able to see it, even if you stumble against it.
FBM
 
  0  
Reply Fri 22 May, 2015 09:12 pm
@Herald,
You could make it a lot easier for us to "stumble against" by bringing it here. Y'know, like an intellectually honest person would. Wink
Herald
 
  1  
Reply Fri 22 May, 2015 09:33 pm
@FBM,
No, thank you, ... and BTW stop asking that retard question: it is not even interesting any more.
FBM
 
  0  
Reply Fri 22 May, 2015 09:37 pm
@Herald,
I find it fascinating as long as you still defend it. When you admit that it's nonsense, then I will lose all interest in it. http://i206.photobucket.com/albums/bb192/DinahFyre/coffe.gif
Herald
 
  1  
Reply Fri 22 May, 2015 10:31 pm
@FBM,
FBM wrote:
I find it fascinating as long as you still defend it.
     A quiz: how do you make a distinction between intelligent process and non-intelligent one?
FBM
 
  0  
Reply Fri 22 May, 2015 10:50 pm
@Herald,
If it involves a red herring or other logical fallacies, it's not very intelligent. Where's your evidence to support your earth design-teleporting, invisible alien/ILF/god-thingies?
Herald
 
  1  
Reply Fri 22 May, 2015 11:02 pm
@FBM,
Why don't you simply answer the question: How do you distinct intelligent from non-intelligent process?
FBM
 
  0  
Reply Fri 22 May, 2015 11:04 pm
@Herald,
What part of this answer:
Quote:
If it involves a red herring or other logical fallacies, it's not very intelligent. Where's your evidence to support your earth design-teleporting, invisible alien/ILF/god-thingies?
went over your head?
Herald
 
  1  
Reply Sat 23 May, 2015 12:40 am
@FBM,
Prove that you understand anything of the theme here. What is the physical interpretation of: Infinite Gravitation; Infinite Temperature; Existing before Time; appearing out of Nowhere; Coming out of Nothing; and Happening Naturally? Are all these concepts really physics, or they are simply fable for idiots ... and how much % do you believe in all that?
FBM
 
  0  
Reply Sat 23 May, 2015 12:42 am
@Herald,
The theme is that you're asking such bullshit question to try to find a gap big enough to wedge your ID bullshit into instead of actually providing genuine evidence to support your 45%/30%/25% this-that-or-the other alien/ILF/god-thingy fantasy. You can't escape the need for positive evidence. Give up.
Herald
 
  1  
Reply Sat 23 May, 2015 12:49 am
@FBM,
FBM wrote:
The theme is that you're asking such bullshit question to try to find a gap big enough to wedge your ID bullshit into instead of actually providing genuine evidence
     No, it is nothing of the kind, and if you specify in the end the f'cking gaps I can explain you why.
     By 'bullshit question' probably you mean 'invalid question': prove that it is invalid (if you understand at all what does that mean)!
 

Related Topics

Intelligent Design - Question by giujohn
What is Intelligent Design? - Discussion by RexRed
Do *ANY* creationists understand evolution? - Discussion by rosborne979
The Bed Bug/Parasite Plant Theory - Question by TeePee38
dna worlds - Discussion by Syamsu
DD VERSUS EVOLUTION - Discussion by Setanta
The Evil of god - Discussion by giujohn
 
Copyright © 2024 MadLab, LLC :: Terms of Service :: Privacy Policy :: Page generated in 0.14 seconds on 12/25/2024 at 07:59:32