@FBM,
FBM wrote:Because your questions are nonsense in the first place.
... and second it is not called
nonsense but rather
invalid questions, in which case a justification is provided why the question is invalid. That is the scientific approach, and if you are such great scientist as you are presenting yourself to be, you will say at least why the question
How much is the rate of expansion of the Universe? is invalid to the theme of the Big Bang 'theory'?
FBM wrote:Also, unlike you, I acknowledge that there are people who know more about this than I do.
... and you are not at a level even to understand what they are claiming ... and why.
FBM wrote: I use my reasoning to select the relevant evidence, bring it here and link you to it.
No, this is called easy-makering. Some day you may make a great career in your sciences (whatever they might be), but you will never start understanding the things and the processes driving our Universe and our life - never, and there is a huge difference.
FBM wrote:If you spin off into manic denialism as a result, that your weakness.
Speaking about' 'maniac dinialism' what does the term 'atheism' mean?
FBM wrote:Why don't you simply answer the questions about the evidence for your god with your own words, using your own reasoning?
Aha, I see what is your porblem - you are simply a negative generator ... or perhaps even negative gamma ray burster and you need something to destroy. You cannot even construct anything without a references to some casual talk irrelevant to the blog.
FBM wrote: Why so evasive and intellectually dishonest? Fear? Ignorance? Something else?
Around people like you one may start understanding much better even some claims from the Bible, like for example:
Like 6:41 'Why do you look at the speck of sawdust in your brother's eye and pay no attention to the plank in your own eye?