6
   

Question on more-than

 
 
tri8926
 
Reply Mon 21 Oct, 2013 08:54 pm
I've mulled on a sentence that I seldom use. Does the below sentence sound correct ? or does it sound ambiguous?

" I am more a suitor to university work than corporate office work".

Should I make it clearer by expounding " of" after more, repeat the noun " suitor" after than or a pronoun representing the noun "suitor"?
_"I am more of a suitor to university work than to corporate work"
or
" I am more of a suitor to university work than a suitor to corporate work".
The last one sounds superfluous to me.
** I am not a native speaker, so please help"
  • Topic Stats
  • Top Replies
  • Link to this Topic
Type: Question • Score: 6 • Views: 1,105 • Replies: 21
No top replies

 
JTT
 
  1  
Reply Mon 21 Oct, 2013 09:10 pm
@tri8926,
Quote:
I've mulled over [on] a sentence that I seldom use.


Quote:
" I am more a suitor to university work than corporate office work".


This one is fine and it's perfectly clear. Your other examples work also.

This one,

" I am more of a suitor to university work than a suitor to corporate work".

could also be,

" I am more of a suitor to university work than I am a suitor to corporate work".
0 Replies
 
McTag
 
  1  
Reply Tue 22 Oct, 2013 01:06 am
@tri8926,

I have never seen the word "suitor" used like that.
Look it up in a good dictionary, and see if you want to change it.
Lordyaswas
 
  1  
Reply Tue 22 Oct, 2013 01:09 am
@McTag,
I agree. I've never seen it either.



0 Replies
 
OmSigDAVID
 
  1  
Reply Tue 22 Oct, 2013 01:24 am
@tri8926,
tri8926 wrote:
I've mulled on a sentence that I seldom use.
Does the below sentence sound correct ? or does it sound ambiguous?

" I am more a suitor to university work than corporate office work".

Should I make it clearer by expounding " of" after more,
repeat the noun " suitor" after than or a pronoun representing the noun "suitor"?
_"I am more of a suitor to university work than to corporate work"
or
" I am more of a suitor to university work than a suitor to corporate work".
The last one sounds superfluous to me.
** I am not a native speaker, so please help"
A "suitor" is usually understood to be a fellow
who socially entertains and takes out a young lady before marriage.
Suitors are commonly called: "boyfriends".

Your sentence 'd be better rendered:"I am better suited to
university work than to corporate work"
.






David
izzythepush
 
  -1  
Reply Tue 22 Oct, 2013 03:20 am
@OmSigDAVID,
OmSigDAVID wrote:
Your sentence 'd be better rendered:"I am better suited to
university work than to corporate work"
.


We agree on something.
McTag
 
  1  
Reply Tue 22 Oct, 2013 04:36 pm
@izzythepush,
Yes.
Strange that our resident guru, the one who "understands about how language works", missed that.

Silly cnut.
dalehileman
 
  1  
Reply Tue 22 Oct, 2013 04:44 pm
@izzythepush,
Also Izzy, Tri, you can drop the first "work"
JTT
 
  1  
Reply Tue 22 Oct, 2013 05:25 pm
@McTag,
Quote:
Strange that our resident guru, the one who "understands about how language works", missed that.


Not at all, McTag. That happens to you, me and others all the time. The real test is the large number of language boners you so frequently bring to the language discussions. And what's worse is your fumbling around saying nothing in defense of said boners.

The ones that you have gleaned from your little collection of style manuals. Fowler sits on your shelf unused because you are too embarrassed to use him as a source. In point of fact, you have no sources, you just gurgle out your ignorance.

McTag
 
  1  
Reply Wed 23 Oct, 2013 06:04 am
@JTT,

I don't recognise this description, but as for you, you seem to be a person who can't see the wood for the trees; as evidenced by your latest gaffe.
You're overtrained, over-specialised, and on the way you've lost whatever commonsense you started with.
OmSigDAVID
 
  2  
Reply Wed 23 Oct, 2013 06:17 am
@izzythepush,
OmSigDAVID wrote:
Your sentence 'd be better rendered:"I am better suited to
university work than to corporate work"
.
izzythepush wrote:
We agree on something.
Well, we agree that u r a fine fellow, right ?
izzythepush
 
  0  
Reply Wed 23 Oct, 2013 06:18 am
@OmSigDAVID,
I dunno about that.
0 Replies
 
OmSigDAVID
 
  2  
Reply Wed 23 Oct, 2013 06:27 am
@tri8926,
tri8926 wrote:
I've mulled on a sentence that I seldom use.
Does the below sentence sound correct ? or does it sound ambiguous?

" I am more a suitor to university work than corporate office work".

Should I make it clearer by expounding "of" after more,
repeat the noun " suitor" after than or a pronoun representing the noun "suitor"?
_"I am more of a suitor to university work than to corporate work"
or
" I am more of a suitor to university work than a suitor to corporate work".
The last one sounds superfluous to me.
** I am not a native speaker, so please help"
Sir, if I may,
I will offer some advice beyond ideal grammar, to wit:
In another century, I hired personnel for my law firm.
If someone told me that he is better suited to one type of work,
as distinct from something else, I might very well have probed
his self-description by asking HOW he is better at one than the other.
I respectfully suggest that you plan defensively
and that you be prepared to cope with probing questions.





David
OmSigDAVID
 
  2  
Reply Wed 23 Oct, 2013 06:50 am
@dalehileman,
dalehileman wrote:
Also Izzy, Tri, you can drop the first "work"
If I read it that way,
I 'd be uncertain of whether he was telling me
that he was a better student than a worker.
JTT
 
  1  
Reply Wed 23 Oct, 2013 09:27 am
@McTag,
You either recognize that apt description of you or you are as delusional as Oralboy, OmSig or BillRM.

Quote:
as evidenced by your latest gaffe.


You don't know **** from shinola when it comes to language, McTag.
McTag
 
  1  
Reply Wed 23 Oct, 2013 09:42 am
@JTT,

But you do? So how come you make such howlers?
JTT
 
  1  
Reply Wed 23 Oct, 2013 09:50 am
@McTag,
Quote:
But you do?


Yes, by your own admission, a number of times.
dalehileman
 
  1  
Reply Wed 23 Oct, 2013 09:52 am
@OmSigDAVID,
Quote:
I 'd be uncertain of whether he was telling methat he was a better student than a worker.
Point well taken, Dave, I'll have to mull it over
0 Replies
 
JTT
 
  1  
Reply Wed 23 Oct, 2013 10:16 am
@McTag,
Quote:
So how come you make such howlers?


So how come all you can do is whine about these howlers but you can never discuss them. Because you don't know **** from shinola when it comes to language. You sit dumbfounded, with Fowler or your other prescriptive wags sitting useless on your shelves, and you never discuss anything about the issues you raise.
0 Replies
 
McTag
 
  1  
Reply Thu 24 Oct, 2013 02:50 am
@JTT,

Quote:
Yes, by your own admission, a number of times.


The good mechanic is worthy of his hire, but it doesn't make him an Issigonis nor a Fangio.
0 Replies
 
 

Related Topics

deal - Question by WBYeats
Let pupils abandon spelling rules, says academic - Discussion by Robert Gentel
Please, I need help. - Question by imsak
Is this sentence grammatically correct? - Question by Sydney-Strock
"come from" - Question by mcook
concentrated - Question by WBYeats
 
  1. Forums
  2. » Question on more-than
Copyright © 2024 MadLab, LLC :: Terms of Service :: Privacy Policy :: Page generated in 0.03 seconds on 10/18/2024 at 12:17:43