3
   

What Did Atta and Laden Intend to Accomplish on 9/11/1 ?

 
 
OmSigDAVID
 
  2  
Reply Mon 23 Sep, 2013 09:30 am
@Frank Apisa,
OmSigDAVID wrote:

DAVID wrote:
Did the Moslems expect us to be impressed with their brutality
toward innocent citizens and hurry to worship Allah, in admiration, or fear ?

Frank Apisa wrote:
Isn't "Allah"...the god of Abraham?
I can't speak for the Moslems,
defining their fundamental beliefs, Frank.

David



Frank Apisa wrote:
Okay...but you are a very knowledgeable person, David…and almost intelligent,
knowledgeable person understands that “Allah”…IS the god of Abraham.
DAVID wrote:
Really?? Will u reveal how u have ascertained
what an almost intelligent person understands??
I have never studied Islam, nor have I ever claimed
any scholarship in this theology.

Do u allege that almost intelligent people know
whether Mars or Venus was the God of Abraham ?
Frank Apisa wrote:
Looks like you're gonna be pig-headed about this, huh, David.
Is questioning the source of your information
defined as being: "pig-headed", Frank?
Will my head convert to a different animal, a nicer animal, if I agree with u ?


Frank Apisa wrote:
No problem.

You can ask an Islamist...or Google the topic.
I CAN; yes.
If I ever become sufficiently motivated
to know Islamic theology,
then I 'll bear that in mind.



Frank Apisa wrote:
The god "Allah" is the same Abrahamic god Jews and Christians worship.
U remain more certain of that than me.
How did u ascertain this information ??





David
Frank Apisa
 
  0  
Reply Mon 23 Sep, 2013 09:49 am
@OmSigDAVID,
Quote:
U remain more certain of that than me.
How did u ascertain this information ??


The same way you could...should you become sufficiently motivated, David.
OmSigDAVID
 
  2  
Reply Mon 23 Sep, 2013 09:50 am
@Frank Apisa,
Frank Apisa wrote:

Quote:
U remain more certain of that than me.
How did u ascertain this information ??


The same way you could...should you become sufficiently motivated, David.
OK.
camlok
 
  -1  
Reply Sat 15 Apr, 2017 01:00 pm
@Setanta,
Quote:
There has been an unwarranted focus on Atta, largely i suspect because he was caught and identified on a surveillance camera.


So many lies. Is it any wonder that you folks are such incredible dupes?

Quote:

http://www.consensus911.org/point-h-1/

The Best Evidence
The official story about Atta’s Portland trip contains three mysteries:

Why were Atta’s bags not loaded onto AA 11? In the affidavit, pointed out a Newsday story in 2006, “there was no explanation of why they had not been loaded.” [12]
The loading failure could not be attributed to a late flight: The commuter flight back to Boston was on time, so there was an hour until AA 11 was to depart. [13]
This failure also could not be explained in terms of a careless ground crew, because “Atta was the only passenger among the 81 aboard American Flight 11 whose luggage didn’t make the flight, American sources confirm[ed].” [14]
Why would Atta have put his will in a bag that was to be loaded onto a flight he intended to crash into the World Trade Center?
Why would Atta have taken the risky trip to Portland?
The reasons why these three mysteries exist become understandable in light of news reports in the first days after 9/11:

According to CNN reports of September 12 and the morning of the 13th, two al-Qaeda operatives, Adnan Bukhari and Ameer Bukhari, drove a rented Nissan to Portland, stayed overnight, and then flew back to Boston the next morning in time to board AA 11. [15]
Materials that incriminated al-Qaeda were found by authorities in a Mitsubishi sedan, which had been rented by Mohamed Atta and then left in the parking lot of Boston’s Logan Airport. [16]
Up to that point, this had been the official story, but later in the afternoon of September 13, CNN apologetically reported that neither of the Bukharis could have died on 9/11: Adnan Bukhari was still alive and Ameer Bukhari had died the previous year. [17]
On September 14, although CNN continued to state that Mohamed Atta had left a rented Mitsubishi at Boston’s Logan Airport, [18] the Associated Press stated that the rented Nissan had been driven to Portland by Mohamed Atta, who with his companion “spent the night at the Comfort Inn in South Portland before boarding the plane the next morning.” [19]
This story still said that authorities had found the incriminating materials left by Atta in a rental car at Boston’s Logan Airport, although this part of the story was incoherent, because the new story entailed that Atta must have left his rented Nissan at the Portland Jetport.
On September 16, a full transition to what would become the official story appeared in the Washington Post: Besides stating that “Atta and Alomari rented a car in Boston, drove to Portland, Maine, and took a room Monday night at the Comfort Inn,” it also said that Atta’s incriminating materials were “left in his luggage at Boston’s Logan Airport.” [20]
By October 5, the FBI had created a chronology of the claimed movements of Atta and al-Omari in Portland on September 10, complete with videos and photographs. [21] Internal evidence, however, shows this chronology to be a fabrication. [22]
Internal evidence also shows that the aforementioned affidavit – which indicated that the FBI had from the outset claimed that (a) Atta had driven the Nissan to Portland and (b) the incriminating materials were found in his luggage inside Boston’s Logan Airport – could not have been written and dated on September 12. [23]
Summary and Conclusion
As shown by the evolution of the story about two al-Qaeda operatives flying from Portland to Boston, this story originally had no inexplicable mysteries.

But after it was realized that the Bukhari brothers could not have died on AA 11, the three mysteries –

why Mohamed Atta’s luggage was not loaded onto AA Flight 11,
why he put his will in a bag that was supposed to be loaded onto that doomed flight, and
why he would have taken the risky trip to Portland
– came about as by-products in the course of creating, over the course of several days, a revised version of the original story (according to which Atta and al-Omari replaced the Bukhari brothers as the al-Qaeda operatives who drove a rented Nissan to Portland).

Although this story is complex, it suggests that what became the official story was most likely based on creative imagination, not fact.
0 Replies
 
camlok
 
  -1  
Reply Sat 15 Apr, 2017 01:18 pm
@oralloy,
Quote:
The terrorists say they strongly preferred the White House, but felt that they would not be able to hit it, and were thinking they'd have to hit the Capitol instead.


So much disinformation from folks who know nothing. It all helps grease the propaganda mill.
0 Replies
 
oralloy
 
  0  
Reply Sat 15 Apr, 2017 05:00 pm
@OmSigDAVID,
Rest in Peace OmSigDAVID.
0 Replies
 
camlok
 
  0  
Reply Sat 15 Apr, 2017 06:24 pm
The engine found on Murray St didn't match the engine for the plane that allegedly struck the South Tower. Whoops.

No Arab hijackers.
0 Replies
 
MethSaferThanTHC
 
  -1  
Reply Thu 8 Jun, 2017 10:00 am
@OmSigDAVID,
I think Atta/Laden expected the United States would be a 3rd world political state (not medicinally nor mechanicaly) as a result.

News flash: usa is in a 3rd world state, politically (not medicinally nor mechanically) -as a result of terrorist attack on us soil on 9-11-2001. Certainly, liberals have been using political incorrectness before the terror attack in NYC 9-11-2001 as a means of controlling the US as their 3rd world political state.

Mechanical: camel vs. car
Medicinal: penicillin vs. sunlight
0 Replies
 
camlok
 
  -1  
Reply Thu 8 Jun, 2017 10:01 pm
@Setanta,
Quote:
There has been an unwarranted focus on Atta, largely i suspect because he was caught and identified on a surveillance camera.


Illustrative of the lies you have all been fed. You folks have always shown a grand propensity to gobble down the propaganda fed you.
0 Replies
 
camlok
 
  -1  
Reply Tue 13 Jun, 2017 04:03 pm
@OmSigDAVID,
Quote:
What Did Atta and Laden Intend to Accomplish on 9/11/1 ?


Who knows, maybe another lap dance for Atta and Osama bin Laden had nothing to do with 911.

They were used by the lyingest government to ever plague the planet. Science says, with no doubt whatsoever, that there no hijackers.

1. Molten/vaporized steel means no hijackers.

2. Nanothermite means no hijackers.

3. WTC7 freefall means no hijackers.

4. Accelerating collapses of the twin towers means no hijackers.

5. ...

0 Replies
 
cameronleon
 
  1  
Reply Wed 13 Sep, 2017 07:08 pm
After a review I have made, the intentions of the dudes who crashed airplanes in New York and the Pentagon were just to hit buildings and cause some damage.

I will explain.

_____________________________________________

A dude found out that his girlfriend is cheating on him

He decided to take revenge.

The girlfriend lived in a house located in the corner of the block, without fences and with easy access to the front door. There is a two car garage door besides the main entrance front door.

This dude knew that his girlfriend sits in the sofa to watch her preferred TV series at 7:00 pm

The sofa is located close to the main front door.

The dude calculated that using his father trailer, he can hit the front door and get inside and kill the girlfriend, probably kill himself, and probably destroy most of her house. He wants to make the most possible damage to make his point. He is nuts, he wants revenge.

And, 7:00pm he had a big shot of strong liquor and came and speeding from a block away distance the trailer indeed broke the whole entrance, killed his girlfriend, killed her two sisters, injured her mother, and fuel and antifreeze started to come out from the trailer and sparks from the broken electrical wiring of the house caused a fire.

What this dude didn't know, was that the father of the girlfriend worked as a demolition who uses explosives was a crooked dude as well.

There were illegally lots of these explosives in the garage.

When the fire reached the garage, the explosion was that hard that more than half of the block went away, and a huge crater was the ending of the event.

________________________________________

From here, the investigation and charges started to be very complicated.

At the end, prosecutors, attorneys and judge concluded:

1)- Charges against the jealous dude were to kill 3 people, injured 1, suicide, destruction of the front side of the house, fire in the living room and garage areas .

2)- Charges against the father of the cheater girl were to illegally storage explosives in his house, and charges of being responsible of the dead of 13 neighbors and destruction of 9 houses.

__________________________________

The intentions of the dudes who hit the buildings with airplanes were just that, to cause a kind of destruction of the structure and fire like crazy. Probable killing 50 to 100 people, excluding the airplane passengers.

Such is the charge those dudes deserve.

_________________________________________

The construction of the Twin Towers has been the worst of the worst constructions ever made for such a gigantic structure.

Those buildings were practically gigantic Lego toy buildings.

It was a kind of a novelty in construction.

Everything was jointed with bolts and tongue and groove method, nothing to "glue" them as traditional constructions. Parts were the whole prefabricated before installation.

Those buildings were solid in appearance only.

The weight of the top part over the weak section because the fire, caused the falling of the entire construction.

Like the analogy given above, the terrorists intentions wasn't the complete falling of the buildings, the intellectual dudes who planned the attacks surely were surprised themselves with the final out coming.

______________________________________

Following the analogy from above, the builders of the Twin Towers should be charged for constructing such a miserable structure. In the charges must be included about 3,000 dead people.





camlok
 
  1  
Reply Wed 22 Aug, 2018 02:01 pm
@cameronleon,
Quote:
The construction of the Twin Towers has been the worst of the worst constructions ever made for such a gigantic structure.

Those buildings were practically gigantic Lego toy buildings.

It was a kind of a novelty in construction.

Everything was jointed with bolts and tongue and groove method, nothing to "glue" them as traditional constructions. Parts were the whole prefabricated before installation.

Those buildings were solid in appearance only.

The weight of the top part over the weak section because the fire, caused the falling of the entire construction.


You don't have the foggiest notion of what you speak of, Cameron. The only reason there has been no other challengers to this claptrap you have offered above is that the vast majority of A2Kers are scared shitless about discussing 911 because they know there were no 19 Arab hijackers, there were no foreign hijackers at all.

You have been hijacked by your own US governments, oh highly gullible ones!
0 Replies
 
 

Related Topics

The horror of Sept. 11th, 2001 - Discussion by trying2learn
Mosque to be Built Near Ground Zero - Discussion by Phoenix32890
9/11/01: Mary Pope and Eurodiva - Discussion by Miller
Lights over Manhattan. - Discussion by Frank Apisa
The truth about what really happened in the USA - Discussion by reasoning logic
9/11 - Discussion by Brandon9000
America At War - Question by blueveinedthrobber
 
Copyright © 2018 MadLab, LLC :: Terms of Service :: Privacy Policy :: Page generated in 0.03 seconds on 12/10/2018 at 11:31:17