@Setanta,
Setanta wrote:There has been an unwarranted focus on Atta, largely i suspect because he was caught and identified on a surveillance camera. He was just one team leader out of the four teams.
I might be
rong,
but I 've gotten the general impression that he was more than that.
Setanta wrote:We all expect our soldiers to excel at the tasks assigned them.
As for being fanatics, certainly they were. But they weren't fanatics because they were Muslims.
They were fanatics who happened to be Muslims. Raised in different circumstances, but having any profound grievance,
they'd just have been fanatics of a different type.
Thay were fanatics about their religion.
Setanta wrote:You go on and on about being in mensa,
I mention it once in a while,
if its relevant. Tho u have bad manners, & I dislike u, I allow for the possibility
that u might be in the top
2% of measured intellect. [
I expect a BOMBASTIC assurance that he IS! ]
Setanta wrote:and they you fail to recognize basic distinctions among a group as large and diverse as the Muslim world.
They are not all the same, any more than all Christians ae the same, or all people of European descent.
True, that I have not overtly commented on it, but I have tacitly accepted it; I don't care much.
Bear in mind that I am not much more than a retired attorney enjoying his
GOLDEN YEARS,
and neither the military, the State Dept. nor the Intelligence Community care what I think about anything.
I 'm just passing the time of day.
Setanta wrote:Bin Laden happened to have been a Sunni fundamentalist. That means he didn't care if Shi'ites lived or died, and would have been happy to see as many of them out of this life as possible. Saying Muslim fanatic is about as precise as saying Christian fanatic--that's more than a billion people in the category, so you really aren't saying anything meaningful at all.
Your objection is noted.
David