1
   

Before sex, ask yourself: What would George W. Bush do?

 
 
Reply Fri 2 Apr, 2004 10:02 am
Bush Administration Considering Warning Labels on Condom Packages

WASHINGTON (AP) ?- The Bush administration is considering requiring warning labels on condom packages noting that the contraceptive devices do not protect users from all sexually transmitted diseases.

Most recent studies indicate condoms do not safeguard against human papillomavirus, or HPV, a little-known but widespread sexually transmitted disease that, untreated, can cause genital warts or cervical cancer.

The FDA "has developed a regulatory plan to provider condom users with a consistent labeling message and the protection they should expect from condom use," Daniel G. Schultz, director of the agency's Office of Device Evaluation, said Thursday.

The agency "is preparing new guidance on condom labeling to address these issues," Schultz told members of a House Government Reform subcommittee.

Package labels now say that condoms, if properly used, reduce the risk of AIDS and other sexually transmitted diseases. The labels are silent on the issue of HPV. The question now is whether that statement needs to have any additional information regarding protection against the cervical cancer virus ?- without discouraging people from using condoms for AIDS protection.

The FDA has considered warning labels since 2000, when President Clinton directed the agency to re-examine whether information included in packages accurately reflected condom effectiveness in preventing all sexually transmitted diseases, including HPV.

But some lawmakers feared that such labels could turn people away from using condoms, thereby increasing the risk of contracting diseases such as AIDS, chlamydia and gonorrhea.

"Anything that undermines the effectiveness of condoms for these uses will have serious public health consequences," said Rep. Henry Waxman, D-Calif. "Are condoms perfect? Of course not. But reality requires us not to make a public health strategy against protection, but rather to ask a key question: compared to what?"

Some lawmakers "insist that abstinence-only education is the solution to teen pregnancy and sexually transmitted diseases because abstinence works each time," Waxman said. "Well, the evidence, however, indicates that abstinence-only education works rarely, if at all."

Responded Rep. Jo Ann Davis, R-Va.: "This is not about social ideology, or religious ideology. It's about informing women. ... And truly, the only way to be protected is abstinence. That's not ideology ?- it's fact."

The White House wants to double, to $270 million, federal spending on education programs to convince young people that abstinence is the only certain way to prevent the spread of sexually transmitted diseases. But an independent report for the government two years ago indicated that no reliable evidence exists that abstinence programs work.

More than 2 million American women are infected with HPV each year, said Ed Thompson, deputy director for public health services at the Centers for Disease Control. Ten thousand women are diagnosed annually with cervical cancer, claiming 4,000 lives, Thompson said
  • Topic Stats
  • Top Replies
  • Link to this Topic
Type: Discussion • Score: 1 • Views: 1,484 • Replies: 5
No top replies

 
patiodog
 
  1  
Reply Fri 2 Apr, 2004 12:29 pm
Abstinence education! That always kills me. Like believing in fairy tales.

Oh, wait a minute...
0 Replies
 
joefromchicago
 
  1  
Reply Fri 2 Apr, 2004 12:38 pm
I suppose it's true that condoms don't entirely prevent the spread of HPV. But then they also don't prevent the spread of beri-beri, dengue fever, yaws, smallpox, or the heebie-jeebies.

Of course, I think most men, on hearing this news, would respond: "there's a warning on the package?"
0 Replies
 
Setanta
 
  1  
Reply Fri 2 Apr, 2004 12:40 pm
I dunno, Joe, i've used condoms right regular, an' never had the heebie-jeebies. Works just as good as my elephant repellant.
0 Replies
 
caprice
 
  1  
Reply Fri 2 Apr, 2004 12:42 pm
joefromchicago wrote:
Of course, I think most men, on hearing this news, would respond: "there's a warning on the package?"


*LOL*
0 Replies
 
joefromchicago
 
  1  
Reply Fri 2 Apr, 2004 12:47 pm
Setanta wrote:
I dunno, Joe, i've used condoms right regular, an' never had the heebie-jeebies. Works just as good as my elephant repellant.

Homer: Not a bear in sight. The Bear Patrol must be working like a charm.
Lisa: That's spacious reasoning, Dad.
Homer: Thank you, dear.
Lisa: By your logic I could claim that this rock keeps tigers away.
Homer: Oh, how does it work?
Lisa: It doesn't work.
Homer: Uh-huh.
Lisa: It's just a stupid rock.
Homer: Uh-huh.
Lisa: But I don't see any tigers around, do you?
[Homer thinks of this, then pulls out some money]
Homer: Lisa, I want to buy your rock.
0 Replies
 
 

Related Topics

T'Pring is Dead - Discussion by Brandon9000
Another Calif. shooting spree: 4 dead - Discussion by Lustig Andrei
Before you criticize the media - Discussion by Robert Gentel
Fatal Baloon Accident - Discussion by 33export
The Day Ferguson Cops Were Caught in a Bloody Lie - Discussion by bobsal u1553115
Robin Williams is dead - Discussion by Butrflynet
Amanda Knox - Discussion by JTT
 
  1. Forums
  2. » Before sex, ask yourself: What would George W. Bush do?
Copyright © 2026 MadLab, LLC :: Terms of Service :: Privacy Policy :: Page generated in 0.03 seconds on 03/07/2026 at 04:53:25