In Post: # 5,397,085, you describe Bill as "a very bizarre human bean" when all he had done was describe the system as it works.
Then in Post: # 5,397,107, you faulted "the examples you choose to cite in support of your argument. if we can call it that...".
And his example, graphic as it was illustrated that his argument was a solid one, yours, not so much, Rocky.
Then, in Post: # 5,397,113, you went completely tangential; Mr Whiner himself offered this sage advice:
"life is what you make it billy"
And ended it up with this on topic comment, which, of course, we all have to note pretty much devastated Bill's entire argument and saw you the winner of another debate:
"yours is obviously very colorful and full of twisted verbs..."
I don't believe I've blamed billy for anything but being billy, jtt.
you are of course entitled to your own vitriolic canadian opinion...
Finally, even after your own words illustrate that the only thing you did with respect to Bill's argument was heap vitriol upon him, just because it was BillRM, you make these lame excuses for yourself.