1
   

How 9-11 happened

 
 
Fedral
 
Reply Thu 1 Apr, 2004 02:51 pm
How 9-11 happened[/u]

We don't need a "commission" to find out how 9-11 happened. The truth is in the timeline:

PRESIDENT CARTER, DEMOCRAT

In 1979, President Jimmy Carter allowed the Shah of Iran to be deposed by a mob of Islamic fanatics. A few months later, Muslims stormed the U.S. Embassy in Iran and took American Embassy staff hostage.

Carter retaliated by canceling Iranian visas. He eventually ordered a disastrous and humiliating rescue attempt, crashing helicopters in the desert.

PRESIDENT REAGAN, REPUBLICAN

The day of Reagan's inauguration, the hostages were released.

In 1982, the U.S. Embassy in Beirut was bombed by Muslim extremists.

President Reagan sent U.S. Marines to Beirut.

In 1983, the U.S. Marine barracks in Beirut were blown up by Muslim extremists.

Reagan said the U.S. would not surrender, but Democrats threw a hissy fit, introducing a resolution demanding that our troops be withdrawn. Reagan caved in to Democrat caterwauling in an election year and withdrew our troops - bombing Syrian-controlled areas on the way out. Democrats complained about that, too.

In 1985, an Italian cruise ship, the Achille Lauro, was seized and a 69-year-old American was shot and thrown overboard by Muslim extremists.

Reagan ordered a heart-stopping mission to capture the hijackers after "the allies" promised them safe passage. In a daring operation, American fighter pilots captured the hijackers and turned them over to the Italians - who then released them to safe harbor in Iraq.

On April 5, 1986, a West Berlin discotheque frequented by U.S. servicemen was bombed by Muslim extremists from the Libyan Embassy in East Berlin, killing an American.

Ten days later, Reagan bombed Libya, despite our dear ally France refusing the use of their airspace. Americans bombed Gadhafi's residence, killing his daughter, and dropped a bomb on the French Embassy "by mistake."

Reagan also stoked a long, bloody war between heinous regimes in Iran and Iraq. All this was while winning a final victory over Soviet totalitarianism.

PRESIDENT BUSH I, MODERATE REPUBLICAN

In December 1988, a passenger jet, Pan Am Flight 103, was bombed over Lockerbie, Scotland, by Muslim extremists.

President-elect George Bush claimed he would continue Reagan's policy of retaliating against terrorism, but did not. Without Reagan to gin her up, even Prime Minister Margaret Thatcher went wobbly, saying there would be no revenge for the bombing.

In 1990, Saddam Hussein invaded Kuwait.

In early 1991, Bush went to war with Iraq. A majority of Democrats opposed the war, and later complained that Bush didn't "finish off the job" with Saddam.

PRESIDENT BILL CLINTON, DEMOCRAT

In February 1993, the World Trade Center was bombed by Muslim fanatics, killing five people and injuring hundreds.

Clinton, advised by Dick Clarke, did nothing.

In October 1993, 18 American troops were killed in a savage firefight in Somalia. The body of one American was dragged through the streets of Mogadishu as the Somalian hordes cheered.

Clinton responded by calling off the hunt for Mohammed Farrah Aidid and ordering our troops home. Osama bin Laden later told ABC News: "The youth ... realized more than before that the American soldier was a paper tiger and after a few blows ran in defeat."

In November 1995, five Americans were killed and 30 wounded by a car bomb in Saudi Arabia set by Muslim extremists.

Clinton, advised by Dick Clarke, did nothing.

In June 1996, a U.S. Air Force housing complex in Saudi Arabia was bombed by Muslim extremists.

Clinton, advised by Dick Clarke, did nothing.

Months later, Saddam attacked the Kurdish-controlled city of Erbil.

Clinton, advised by Dick Clarke, lobbed some bombs into Iraq hundreds of miles from Saddam's forces.

In November 1997, Iraq refused to allow U.N. weapons inspections to do their jobs and threatened to shoot down a U.S. U-2 spy plane.

Clinton, advised by Dick Clarke, did nothing.

In February 1998, Clinton threatened to bomb Iraq, but called it off when the United Nations said no.

On Aug. 7, 1998, U.S. embassies in Kenya and Tanzania were bombed by Muslim extremists.

Clinton, advised by Dick Clarke, did nothing.

On Aug. 20, Monica Lewinsky appeared for the second time to testify before the grand jury.

Clinton responded by bombing Afghanistan and Sudan, severely damaging a camel and an aspirin factory.

On Dec. 16, the House of Representatives prepared to impeach Clinton the next day.

Clinton retaliated by ordering major air strikes against Iraq, described by the New York Times as "by far the largest military action in Iraq since the end of the Gulf War in 1991."

The only time Clinton decided to go to war with anyone in the vicinity of Muslim fanatics was in 1999 - when Clinton attacked Serbians who were fighting Islamic fanatics.

In October 2000, our warship, the USS Cole, was attacked by Muslim extremists.

Clinton, advised by Dick Clarke, did nothing.

PRESIDENT GEORGE BUSH, REPUBLICAN

Bush came into office telling his national security adviser, Condoleezza Rice, he was "tired of swatting flies" - he wanted to eliminate al-Qaida.

On Sept. 11, 2001, when Bush had been in office for barely seven months, 3,000 Americans were murdered in a savage terrorist attack on U.S. soil by Muslim extremists.

Since then, Bush has won two wars against countries that harbored Muslim fanatics, captured Saddam Hussein, immobilized Osama bin Laden, destroyed al-Qaida's base, and begun to create the only functioning democracy in the Middle East other than Israel. Democrats opposed it all - except their phony support for war with Afghanistan, which they immediately complained about and said would be a Vietnam quagmire. And now they claim to be outraged that in the months before 9-11, Bush did not do everything Democrats opposed doing after 9-11.

What a surprise.

Click here to find out who wrote it.
  • Topic Stats
  • Top Replies
  • Link to this Topic
Type: Discussion • Score: 1 • Views: 963 • Replies: 14
No top replies

 
Foxfyre
 
  1  
Reply Thu 1 Apr, 2004 02:57 pm
Well the 'anybody but Bush' people will discount this because of who wrote it.

But I doubt any can dispute the facts outlined here.

But there are those who say we should go home and do nothing again. After all, hasn't appeasement or 'turning the other cheek' worked so far?
0 Replies
 
Tarantulas
 
  1  
Reply Thu 1 Apr, 2004 03:20 pm
Lovely!

Nice article, too! Wink
0 Replies
 
Walter Hinteler
 
  1  
Reply Thu 1 Apr, 2004 03:22 pm
Quote:
April 1, 2004
0 Replies
 
Fedral
 
  1  
Reply Thu 1 Apr, 2004 03:29 pm
Walter Hinteler wrote:
Quote:
April 1, 2004


Walter, all the dates and actions (or inactions) are verifyable if you look them up. This is NOT an April 1 article.
0 Replies
 
Dartagnan
 
  1  
Reply Thu 1 Apr, 2004 03:31 pm
No, but it's foolish anyway...
0 Replies
 
L R R Hood
 
  1  
Reply Thu 1 Apr, 2004 03:33 pm
The actions of the Presidents, and other leaders, are always dependent on many factors... basically, they have to answer to people who are seemingly more powerful than they are... and there's always the coming election to consider. So sad.
0 Replies
 
PDiddie
 
  1  
Reply Thu 1 Apr, 2004 03:42 pm
Quote:
In February 1993, the World Trade Center was bombed by Muslim fanatics, killing five people and injuring hundreds.

Clinton, advised by Dick Clarke, did nothing.


Well, if you call arresting, prosecuting, convicting, and sentencing to prison the people who committed the crime 'nothing'...

You're probably blinded by your Republicanism.
0 Replies
 
Titus
 
  1  
Reply Thu 1 Apr, 2004 03:42 pm
ROFLMAO!!!

You know the Bush loyalists are getting scared when they reach back even before Clinton, all the way to Carter, to find excuses for King George the Liar's myriad woes and inadequacies.

Yes, fedral -- the great Shah of Iran. Once removed by the soveriegn Iranian people in the early 1950's, only to be reinstalled by the CIA! The great Shah of Iran, who had a laundry list of human rights abuses that easily equal that of Saddam Hussein.

And as far as your great Bush winning "two wars," only a Bush lemming could call the invasion of Afghanistan a "war." Jeez - Louise, the Afghanis were mired in the 12th century and hurled rocks and bottles at the invading American forces.

Too funny!
0 Replies
 
Fedral
 
  1  
Reply Thu 1 Apr, 2004 04:08 pm
Titus wrote:


And as far as your great Bush winning "two wars," only a Bush lemming could call the invasion of Afghanistan a "war." Jeez - Louise, the Afghanis were mired in the 12th century and hurled rocks and bottles at the invading American forces.

Too funny!


The Afghani's hurled a lot more than 'rocks and bottles' at the Soviet Union's tanks and APCs when they invaded.
In fact, they hurled so much pain and suffering upon them that the Army that had defeated Hitler, fought the japanese to a standstill, mauled the chinese on numerous occasions and managed to keep the largest country in the world under control (as well as it's satellite countries in the Warsaw Pact) The Army that had more tanks, APCs, helicopters and planes than any other nation on Earth, was forced out by those same '12th Century' peoples who were hurling RPGs, SAMs and everything else they had...

No one takes the fighting spirit of the Afghani's lightly... I suggest you read Rudyard Kipling for some of the views of the British soldiers about them.
0 Replies
 
Umbagog
 
  1  
Reply Thu 1 Apr, 2004 04:29 pm
You can't make this claim because the Bush White House is not releasing a lot of Clinton paperwork on terrorism...so you can't know, nor can you report what you are, because a huge chunk of information is still missing and being deliberately withheld. Gee, I wonder why?
0 Replies
 
Foxfyre
 
  1  
Reply Thu 1 Apr, 2004 04:50 pm
No need to shout Umbagog. And the Clinton paperwork related to terrorism is all a matter of public record. Most of it has been in the papers and the rest is in the Congressional Record. All that has been sealed are the private presidential papers and this is not in any way unusual.
0 Replies
 
Dartagnan
 
  1  
Reply Fri 2 Apr, 2004 10:11 am
Destroying the armies in Afghanistan (did they have one?) and Iraq is hardly a reason to crow. Good grief. The US has the most powerful military in the world, and these are essentially third world countries.

It's winning the peace that's the challenge...
0 Replies
 
Foxfyre
 
  1  
Reply Fri 2 Apr, 2004 10:42 am
Anyone who thinks taking out the Taliban in Afghanistan was a piece of cake simply has not read the history of the last people who attempted to do that: i.e. the then world power U.S.S.R.

But nevertheless, no one who knows and understands history believes that the absence of war is peace either.
0 Replies
 
Tarantulas
 
  1  
Reply Mon 5 Apr, 2004 01:55 am
http://www.allspark.net/graphics/posticon_bump.gif
0 Replies
 
 

Related Topics

Obama '08? - Discussion by sozobe
Let's get rid of the Electoral College - Discussion by Robert Gentel
McCain's VP: - Discussion by Cycloptichorn
Food Stamp Turkeys - Discussion by H2O MAN
The 2008 Democrat Convention - Discussion by Lash
McCain is blowing his election chances. - Discussion by McGentrix
Snowdon is a dummy - Discussion by cicerone imposter
TEA PARTY TO AMERICA: NOW WHAT?! - Discussion by farmerman
 
  1. Forums
  2. » How 9-11 happened
Copyright © 2024 MadLab, LLC :: Terms of Service :: Privacy Policy :: Page generated in 0.03 seconds on 04/19/2024 at 09:12:23