@contrex,
Quote:
What is this 'Pulitzer Prize' of which you speak?
Needless to say, I was being facetious there. I don't think the title of a play* that won the Pulitzer for drama** (in 1924!), and a "usually" in a Merriam-Webster definition are sufficient to shift me from the position that "bent for sth" is at least a (very) minority usage if not aberrant in BrE. I suppose it may be more acceptable in AmE than BrE.
* Titles of works often contain plays on words or wildly non-standard usages.
** The 1932 winner was " Of Thee I Sing" - does that mean we can all talk like Amish without getting odd looks in supermarket checkout lines? - the 1934 novel winner was "Lamb in His Bosom"; does that mean I can go about with a sheep in my shirt?
The list of Pulitzer winners reminds me irresistibly of the crazy lists in "Mulligan Stew" by Gilbert Sorrentino - one of the funniest books I have ever read.
I maintain the above notwithstanding "Hell-Bent For Election" (a 1944 film) and "Hell-Bent For Leather" (The 5th album by Judas Priest) and even " Hell Bent For Leather" (2007 British film set in the glam-rock era).