My point is that liberal court justices, when considering major social issues, tend to start from the decision that they want and then use whatever tortured logic is necessary to reach it. They are simply legislating. The Constitution doesn't mention abortion.
The Constitution doesn't mention a right to privacy so according to your reading the government can read your mail whenever they want to. They can collect your phone data without needing a court order.
Of course you fail to read the entire US Constitution when it comes to your interpretation. The 9th amendment reads as follows:
The enumeration in the Constitution, of certain rights, shall not be construed to deny or disparage others retained by the people.
So just because a right isn't mentioned in the Constitution doesn't mean it doesn't exist as a right.
They are simply legislating. The Constitution doesn't mention abortion.
Since you want to bring up the fact that the Constitution doesn't mention abortion then that would mean it is not a power granted to government therefor they can't pass any laws concerning abortion. And if you want to argue that means it reverts to the states then we are back to rights not enumerated in the Constitution and the 14th amendment.