@parados,
parados wrote:
Who cares what's in the US Constitution? Certainly not the state of Texas since they are willing to ignore what the USSC has said is there.
My point is that liberal court justices, when considering major social issues, tend to start from the decision that they want and then use whatever tortured logic is necessary to reach it. They are simply legislating. The Constitution doesn't mention abortion.
Some people think that the idea of citizens and their elected representatives being able to vote for laws they want is important. You've heard of this word, democracy, right? If a segment of the political spectrum frequently has its votes nullified by the courts based on fictitious Constitutional principles, please tell me why they wouldn't be justified in having a violent revolution? If violence isn't justified by having someone take away your right to vote, what would be important enough to justify it?