@oralloy,
Quote:
Americans aren't required to cower away from people who might choose to attack us. We have the right to carry guns, and we have the right to defend ourselves.
That said, refusing to hide from potential aggressors does not mean someone is looking for confrontation.
That's true, Trayvon Martin had every right to defend himself from someone he believed might pose a danger to his life. Just because he didn't run and hide didn't mean he was looking for a confrontation. He was on his way home. He had a legitimate right to be in that place at that time.
Quote:Do you have any evidence to support your supposition that Zimmerman was looking for a confrontation?
How about the fact he didn't remain in his car?
How about the fact that there was never a need for him to get out of his car?
How about the fact that his neighborhood watch responsibilities ended when he called the police non-emergency number, and that everything he did after that was motivated by his own need to be a vigilante, since the police dispatcher told him the police didn't need him to do anything else?
How about the fact that the phone conversation reported by Rachel Jeantel indicated it was Zimmerman who approached and confronted Martin, without even identifying himself to Martin, and that was after Martin was already apprehensive about why this creepy guy had been watching and following him?
Why didn't Zimmerman just continue going to Target after he called the police? That was his destination that night when he happened to spot and profile Martin. So, after he discharged his neighborhood watch responsibilities, by calling the police to report a "suspicious" character, who wasn't doing much of anything beside walking around and trying to dodge the train, why didn't Zimmerman just continue driving to Target?
Someone not looking for a confrontation would have simply remained in his car and waited for the police to show up and do their job. Or he would have driven off, continued his trip to Target, and left the police to handle it when they showed up. He had not witnessed any sort of crime in progress, there was nothing urgent occurring, so there was no reason for him to hang around there, the police didn't need him to do that either.
Where's your evidence that Zmmerman wasn't looking for a confrontation, since the evidence just cited suggests otherwise?