The State of Florida vs George Zimmerman: The Trial

Zimmerman's attorney is not unbiased. And he's already preparing for a possible civil suit--he said that also.
That's why they are continuing to blame Martin for his own death.

Zimmerman got a fair trial, that included considerable evidence
pointing to his possible guilt.

That he managed to get acquitted, because the jury was not convinced,
beyond a reasonable doubt, of his guilt, is a testament to the fairness of the system.

This is your usual mantra of "abuse at the hands of the state."
Have you forgotten the man killed someone.

You can't walk around, playing neighborhood vigilante, while packing a gun,

and shoot and kill unarmed minors, who aren't even trespassing,

and not expect to be held answerable and legally accountable for your actions.

And the thought that Zimmerman can still walk around carrying that gun, shouldn't comfort anyone...

Without that gun in Zimmerman's possession, Martin would still be alive,

Zimmerman wouldn't have gone through his legal ordeal, and none of this would have happened.

but something that really bothers me is that zimmermans parents were not allowed to attend this trial, on the demand of the state of Florida. petty and cruel is what this was.

George Zimmerman‘s parents have been banned from the courtroom of their son’s murder trial. The decision by Judge Debra Nelson was made because Zimmerman’s parents may be called as witnesses by the State of Florida.

By Florida law, the victim’s family must be allowed to remain in the courtroom if they so choose, which means that Trayvon Martin‘s parents will be able to attend the trial. The family of the defendant in a murder trial has no such protections.
http://www.mediaite.com/tv/george-zimmermans-parents-barred-from-courtroom-trayvon-martins-family-allowed-to-stay/

Unidentified sources within the Administration have confirmed that Obama, and Justice Eric Holder at the Department of Justice have filed charges against Zimmerman for “violating Trayvon Martin’s civil rights”.

Zimmerman got a fair trial, that included considerable evidence pointing to his possible guilt.

we dont know that they had any major disagreements to work out, it is easy to immagine that it took that long to agree to a process and then carry out that process.

Could be a hoax. Nobody else is reporting it.

Would this considerable evidence happen to be the very same evidence that you refuse to explain when people ask straightforward questions?

I don't have to explain the state's case to you. Go read it for yourself.

You can read, can't you? Or is that you can't understand the state's case? Well. if that's the case, why should I bother explaining it to you. That's why the state presented days of evidence and testimony, that apparently went right over your little head.

If you understood the state's case, you wouldn't be asking the questions.

I didn't make any claims,

birdbrain,

You couldn't understand the trial, parrot boy. You know, all of those days of testimony and evidence that the state presented. Now you want someone to explain it to you.

You trash shouldn't run around falsely accusing your betters of your own stupidity.

but the difference between you and I is that I dont misrepresent where the facts lay