@mysteryman,
Quote:But you weren't on the jury and didn't hear and see all the evidence.
Actually, those not on the jury, were able to consider other evidence--like the lying about his assets, and the transfer of money between accounts to conceal them from his own lawyer and the court, so he would get a lower bail, and how Zimmerman and his wife spoke in code, while he was incarcerated awaiting bail, so no one would realize what they were talking about. He clearly showed, in that situation, that he's a brazen and accomplished liar.
And, since his self-defense claim rested mainly on his credibility, those outside of the jury, who had other evidence regarding his character and honesty, like what went on with his bail hearings, might be more inclined to disbelieve his version of the events that led to the shooting.
And the public was able to see all of the evidence which was presented to the jury, with the possible exception of some autopsy photos of Martin. So the public wasn't at a disadvantage compared to the jury. Those who wanted to watch the trial, saw complete gavel to gavel coverage. Nothing was hidden.
So certainly, some may not agree with the jury's verdict in this case, based on the evidence they heard at trial, just as many didn't agree with the verdict in the Casey Anthony trial. But we all must accept the jury's verdict--regardless of whether we agree with it--that's how our system works.
I'm glad this case is finally over.
