27
   

The State of Florida vs George Zimmerman: The Trial

 
 
coldjoint
 
  0  
Fri 20 Dec, 2013 11:57 am
@firefly,
Quote:
George Zimmerman, infamous for his murder acquittal in the Trayvon Martin shooting case,


Infamous? Some people plainly do not feel that way. But the people that do are responsible for any attention he receives now. Your whining and bigotry against a man found not guilty by a court of law has backfired.
cicerone imposter
 
  1  
Fri 20 Dec, 2013 12:01 pm
@coldjoint,
You,
Quote:
Some people plainly do not feel that way.


That only proves gun lovers on this thread have no brains! Gun violence in the US is the worst of any country. Being blind to this FACT is tantamount to being not only insensitive to those who have lost loved ones, but support killers like Zimmerman who had no ethical reason for following Trayvon, then killing him. Trayvon did not commit any crime; he was walking home to his father's place from the store. THAT'S NOT A CRIME.
0 Replies
 
Romeo Fabulini
 
  1  
Fri 20 Dec, 2013 12:14 pm
http://i53.photobucket.com/albums/g64/PoorOldSpike/George_Zimmerman_zps4b3e700e.jpg~original
0 Replies
 
firefly
 
  1  
Fri 20 Dec, 2013 12:24 pm
@coldjoint,
Quote:
Your whining and bigotry against a man found not guilty by a court of law...

Right, men found not guilty by a court of law have never gotten away with murder, have they? Laughing

http://www-deadline-com.vimg.net/wp-content/uploads/2013/03/SimsponGlove__130320200103-275x297.jpg
0 Replies
 
BillRM
 
  0  
Fri 20 Dec, 2013 12:37 pm
@coldjoint,
Quote:
But the people that do are responsible for any attention he receives now. Your whining and bigotry against a man found not guilty by a court of law has backfired.


Could not agree more as they are unwilling to see the world as it is but still stict like super glue to the idea that Zimmerman in some white racist and Trayvon is some smiling innocent 13 years old that he gun down.

The media story have everything to make them happy, an innocent black child, a racist white man and a killing driven by racial feelings by a gun repeat by a gun.

The race baiters love it as they can portray a racist white killer and the anti gun nuts love it as they can portray how citizens should not be allowed to be arm.

No amount of facts and no jury verdict is going to get them away from this lovely picture.
0 Replies
 
Romeo Fabulini
 
  0  
Fri 20 Dec, 2013 12:38 pm
Everybody knows the OJ jury were just a bunch of cretins who made the US justice system a laughing stock!
Thankfully, the Zim jury were fine upstanding American citizens..Smile

PS- the OJ glove didn't fit because it'd been blood-soaked and shrunk.
But it still had DNA of Simpson, Nicole and Goldman on it, yet the daffy jury still acquitted him!

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/O._J._Simpson_murder_case
firefly
 
  1  
Fri 20 Dec, 2013 01:02 pm
@Romeo Fabulini,
Quote:
Thankfully, the Zim jury were fine upstanding American citizens

Only in that they showed up for jury duty and fulfilled their civic obligations--as did the O.J. jury.
Quote:

PS- the OJ glove didn't fit because it'd been blood-soaked.
But it still had DNA of Simpson, Nicole and Goldman on it, yet the daffy jury still acquitted him!

And Zimmerman's very minor injuries were in no way consistent with the alleged "beating" or "head-pounding" he claimed he received, and not a drop of Zimmerman's blood or DNA was found on Martin's hands, the hands that allegedly beat him, and touched the blood on his face, "yet the daffy jury still acquitted him!"

And then, of course, there is the little problem that Zimmerman was the one who did the stalking...he's the one who targeted someone else, and caused a totally needless and avoidable death in the process, and then came up with an "unconvincing" self-defense story for the police. The police investigator, much more experienced in these matters than a gullible jury, didn't buy his story.

It's amazing how clever defense attorneys can confuse gullible jurors, and distract them from their client's credibility problems, isn't it? Ya gotta hand it to O.J.'s "dream team", and to Zimmerman's defense team, for both doing that.

O.J. was later found guilty of a wrongful death by a civil trial, and that may yet happen to Zimmerman too.

And Zimmerman may yet wind up in prison, for another crime, just like O.J. did...
cicerone imposter
 
  1  
Fri 20 Dec, 2013 02:43 pm
@firefly,
They continue to repeat their ignorance about the OJ and Zimmerman trials without presenting any evidence from them, but their own sick imaginations of "what might have happened." As they present their imagined activities, they ignore all the evidence provided in the media, trial, and police records.

TNCFS
coldjoint
 
  0  
Fri 20 Dec, 2013 02:53 pm
@cicerone imposter,
Quote:
they ignore all the evidence provided in the media,


Edited tapes. Race baiters like Sharpton. And the DOJ giving money to protest orgs. **** off.
cicerone imposter
 
  1  
Fri 20 Dec, 2013 03:08 pm
@coldjoint,
You make a lot of charges, but nothing to back them up. You're a ******* loser, and you should know that by now! Just plain ignorant.

Present some facts and evidence to your charges; otherwise quit while you're behind. You only dig your own hole deeper!
BillRM
 
  0  
Fri 20 Dec, 2013 03:14 pm
@coldjoint,
Quote:
Edited tapes. Race baiters like Sharpton. And the DOJ giving money to protest orgs. **** off.


You forgotten the word coon the media found in the tape that was not there or the repeat using a four years old or so picture of a smiling 13 or 14 years in the papers and on TV.

Or coming up with the odd term white Latin when Zimmerman have mixed blood including black blood in his veins.
0 Replies
 
coldjoint
 
  1  
Fri 20 Dec, 2013 03:15 pm
@cicerone imposter,
Everyone knows NBC edited the tape to show Zimmerman was racist.

Quote:
Judicial Watch FOIA docs show DoJ facilitated Zimmerman protests in Florida

http://hotair.com/archives/2013/07/10/judicial-watch-foia-docs-show-doj-facilitated-zimmerman-protests-in-florida/
BillRM
 
  0  
Fri 20 Dec, 2013 03:20 pm
@coldjoint,
Quote:
Everyone knows NBC edited the tape to show Zimmerman was racist


If memory serve me correctly once NBC was found out they fired two of their employees over the matter. One wonder why those two was willing to take the fall.
0 Replies
 
cicerone imposter
 
  1  
Fri 20 Dec, 2013 03:21 pm
@coldjoint,
All that report shows is that CBS spent some money to report on those demonstrations.

In the US, it's called 'FREEDOM OF THE PRESS.' Some things you idiots wouldn't know or understand.

Show us what CBS did that's illegal?
coldjoint
 
  0  
Fri 20 Dec, 2013 03:37 pm
@cicerone imposter,
Quote:
All that report shows is that CBS spent some money to report on those demonstrations


Wrong. Read the title of the article again. And CBS just showed their bias. You should be proud that a network is more worried about keeping the race bullshit going. Now you can keep on posting.
0 Replies
 
coldjoint
 
  0  
Fri 20 Dec, 2013 03:41 pm
Quote:
DOJ's Race Case Against Zimmerman Faces FBI Block


There was no lack of trying to crucify Zimmerman on the DOJs part.

Does anyone remembers the charges dropped against the Black Panthers for voter intimidation? They had actual video evidence there. It is all rhetoric and repeated lies and idiots who think they are going to solve a problem by feeding another.
0 Replies
 
coldjoint
 
  0  
Fri 20 Dec, 2013 03:44 pm
Quote:
VIDEO: MSNBC Racist Gets Her Nonsense Slammed Right Back in Her Face


http://www.publiusforum.com/2013/12/20/video-msnbc-racist-gets-nonsense-slammed-right-back-face/
Laughing Laughing Laughing
firefly
 
  2  
Fri 20 Dec, 2013 04:24 pm
@coldjoint,
Gee, that's such an unbiased, objective article you posted. Laughing

You're as big a jerk as the sources you post.

Quote:
Angela Rye, the former Executive Director and General Counsel to the Congressional Black Caucus, amusingly insisted that the GOP is “racist.” Now, let’s remember what the Black Congressional Caucus is. It is a race-based (meaning racist) organization that famously refused to allow a white man to join. And this ignorant whelp has the gall to say that other people are racists?
http://www.publiusforum.com/2013/12/20/video-msnbc-racist-gets-nonsense-slammed-right-back-face/

Why is it "racist" for a group that's intended to address, and discuss, specific minority interests and concerns--be they the interests of blacks, women, Hispanics, etc--to limit their membership to those within that group? That's crazy. The entire Congress represents the interests of white men. But members of minority groups are in a better position to identify and discuss the specific problems of those groups, and they have every right to form caucuses, and meet separately, so they can do that , and then pass along their thinking to the larger, majority group.

There is nothing racist about that.

All race-based groups or organizations are not racist--they may simply be legitimate special interest groups, and not groups formed for the purpose of harming, or restricting, or imperiling, the welfare of other racial groups.

You don't understand the meaning of "racist". That's why you can't see it in yourself.

On the other hand, when the GOP engages in tactics that make it more difficult for blacks to vote, or to register to vote, and they seem to be doing everything short of trying to bring back a Poll Tax, it is not exactly inappropriate to consider their strategy "racist".

cicerone imposter
 
  2  
Fri 20 Dec, 2013 04:35 pm
@firefly,
Quote:
Freedom of assembly
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia


"Sammankomsten" ("The Meeting"), oil painting by Ester Almqvist (sv), original at the Swedish National Museum. the painting was chosen by the UN as a motif for a stamp commemorating the establishment of the Universal Declaration of Human Rights, paragraph 20: the Right of Assembly


Janitorial workers striking in front of the MTV building in Santa Monica, California. Striking in a trade union is a way of exercising freedom of assembly and freedom of association.


Posted excerpt from the US Constitution, at an Occupy Oakland event, 2011
Freedom of assembly, sometimes used interchangeably with the freedom of association, is the individual right to come together and collectively express, promote, pursue and defend common interests.[1] The right to freedom of association is recognized as a human right, political right and civil liberty.
Freedom of assembly and freedom of association may be used to distinguish between the freedom to assemble in public places and the freedom of joining an association. Freedom of assembly is often used in the context of the right to protest, while freedom of association is used in the context of labor rights and the Constitution of the United States, is interpreted to mean both the freedom to assemble and the freedom to join an association.[2][not in citation given]
The United States Constitution explicitly provides for 'the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances'" in the First Amendment.
Like other rights, freedom of assembly is not absolute. For example, the State of Wisconsin has been arresting protesters in the State Capitol since July 2013, after declaring the protests to be unlawful due to the protesters not obtaining a permit.[3][4][5][6]
0 Replies
 
coldjoint
 
  1  
Fri 20 Dec, 2013 07:35 pm
@firefly,
Quote:
Why is it "racist"


How can you even ask that question? Everything is "racist" to people like you.
 

Related Topics

 
Copyright © 2024 MadLab, LLC :: Terms of Service :: Privacy Policy :: Page generated in 0.06 seconds on 04/30/2024 at 06:06:54