@Advocate,
Quote:They invent their own facts and totally reject the real evidence.
No, Advocate, you're really talking about yourself.
You'll insist that Zimmerman was badly beaten and had terrible marks on him to confirm that allegation, but, when I post the real evidence of what he looked like after the shooting, you rejected it, claiming it was some sort of phony picture.
This cell phone photo of Zimmerman was taken after the shooting, and shows a bloody nose. The weird angle of the photo, however, distorts the shape of his nose, making it appear flattened.
This is an official police photo of Zimmerman, taken by the police, in the police station, the night of the shooting, a very short time after the bloody nose photo, after he had wiped the dramatic looking blood off his face. He does not look "beaten up" in any way. He had no terrible marks on him. The shape of his nose is fine. His injuries were very minor. He didn't require any medical treatment, not even a Band-Aid.
Zimmerman's very minor injuries were not consistent with the beating and head-pounding he claimed he received.
That's one reason the chief police investigator on the case found Zimmerman's account "unconvincing," and he recommended to the D.A. that Zimmerman be arrested and charged with manslaughter the night of the shooting.
If you want to look at the "real evidence" you also have to look at the photo of the relatively unharmed Zimmerman after he wiped the blood off his face. The bloody nose photo made his injuries look much more dramatic than they actually were--and noses can bleed from minor trauma. Once the blood was wiped away, Zimmerman looked fine, and his nose looked fine--he did not look "beaten" at all.
So, stop inventing your own facts and rejecting the real evidence.