@hawkeye10,
Quote:it is one of your typical lies to say "the police wanted" when one cop wanted but the department did not want, after the process was run the organization decided that they did not want to arrest Zimmerman.
You're doing your usual act of making a bigger fool of yourself by trying to justify your previous incorrect assertions. You just dig yourself in deeper when you do that, and you never learn from it.
You're confusing what the Police Chief said, at a later time, to try to justify why an arrest wasn't made that night, with what I said. There was a tremendous amount of buck passing, including by that Police Chief, that went on
after the controversy exploded with this case. That Police Chief lost his job, the D,A. was taken off the case. You can't understand it all with a quick Google, which is apparently what you're trying to do.
As usual, your thinking is muddled.
Meanwhile, what I said was accurate--the night of the shooting, the chief police investigator on this case did not believe Zimmerman's version of events, and he wanted him charged with manslaughter that night--he was speaking for the police department that night, when he recommended to the D.A. Zimmerman be charged with manslaughter, that's his job, to convey the department's conclusions to the D.A.. And he continued to find credibility problems with Zimmerman's account, even with subsequent interviews of Zimmerman, as his investigation reports, which you obviously never read, clearly indicated. His thinking actually provided the basis of the state's case against Zimmerman--he pointed out all the credibility problems with Zimmerman's account...
So, buddy, I haven't been lying, and you're still stuck with egg on your face.
