@hawkeye10,
Quote:sure...I am more committed to reality than I am to political theories, so sometimes sacred cow political theories get the knife from me. for me inclusion is only a good thing when it betters civilization, when it stops is where I start to have no use for it, resorting to my belief that individuals have an overriding duty to look out for their own best interest before they take up charity to others. getting in the way of risk assesment is stopping being good for civilization jsyk.
Can I point out what I see as the flaw in your reality?
The Boboboians and the Baluskis, thru their governments and military have killed a lot of people. The people who committed these acts of murder, stealing, rape, spreading WMDs can all be easily identified - they are the Boboboians and the Baluskis.
Following your line of reasoning, all people everywhere should look out for their own best interests, which means that when one encounters a Boboboians or a Baluskis, they should immediately view them as voracious killers and act accordingly, say by following them and killing them should any person other than a Boboboian or a Baluskis deem that to be in their best interests.
I think you should be able to see my question in all this.
================
Quote:I am more committed to reality than I am to political theories, so sometimes sacred cow political theories get the knife from me.
Don't let this be a big distraction from the central issue, above, but does that include the tenets found within the US Constitution?