@hawkeye10,
Quote:once Zimmerman established that he might have a problem a judge ordered him to not touch guns temporarily, and might make the order permanent. so why are you bitching about how the system works?
I'm not bitching about the way the system works--that, I believe, was BillRM and David, who were concerned about Zimmerman's welfare and safety if he's not allowed to have his guns while on bail--I'm glad that, as a condition of bail, he is not allowed to have them. I'm definitely not bitching about it.
And his new lawyer probably wouldn't bitch about it either--she didn't think he should have had a gun the night he killed Martin, and she doesn't think
anyone should have guns.
And the current judge's order, prohibiting Zimmerman from contact with guns, is not related to Zimmerman's mental state or mental illness or "a problem" he might have in that regard--it's related to the nature of the crimes he's accused of. And I'm not sure that judge can issue any sort of permanent order for him to stay away from guns.
Again, you've misinterpreted or distorted my comments, which had to do with emotionally and mentally unstable individuals, with histories of anger management and impulse control problems, being legally entitled to guns. Neither Wayne LaPierre, or the NRA supports that, and that's what my post was about. And you've accused me of bitching about something I'm not bitching about.
You really should be concerned that, more often than not lately, you are not accurately comprehending the posts you respond to.
And my question was specifically addressed to Baldino...