@firefly,
I 'm sorry that I missed this one, Firefly.
I did not mean to ignore your reply.
DAVID wrote:Its really a nice thing to do, in terms of protecting your nabors from burglary.
firefly wrote:Except there was no burglary,
Maybe that was the cause of the violence with which Zimmy was attacked.
Decedent got mad that Zimmy was
interfering with his burglary.
firefly wrote:nor any evidence a burglary was about to take place.
Well, Zimmy thought that he was taking
an
INORDINATE degree of interest in the homes thereabout.
firefly wrote:And, instead of "protecting his nabors",
he wound up menacingly [????] stalking and killing one of them,
How was his following
menacing???
Was it because he called the police on the suspect??
What evidence do u have that Zimmy was menacing??
In regard to his having killed him, I believe that having his head
slammed on the street was a good reason for that; even just
his seating himself on Zimmy 's central body mass
and threatening further violence was justification.
The citizens of Florida are safe from that now.
firefly wrote:who was a guest in his community, because of his impaired judgment and poor impulse control.
It seems to me that
EVERYTHING that Zimmy did that nite was perfectly good and proper.
If Zimmy 's judgment and his impulse control were 1OOO times better,
then logically, he shud have done what he did that night.
1. He called the police on seeing a suspected burglar casing the houses.
2. To help the police, he followed that suspect for a short time.
3. When the suspect knocked him down and began slugging him
and beating his head on the cement, unlawfully shedding Zimmy's
blood,
he shot him thereby ending the threat to himself and to any future victim.
(If I met him, I 'd suggest that he get a
better gun; those little
9mm automatics are un-reliable. Trust in them is unjustified.)
As a new citizen of Florida, Zimmy has my gratitude.
I have already posted that I was in NY last summer.
In the middle of the night, I drove to one of my old naborhoods
from the 194Os. As I gazed upon it, remembering the (gone) familiar stores
in a spirit of nostalgia, I was confronted by a merchant, leaving his business.
I was in a soft ez mood, knowing that this may very well be
the very last time that I set eyes on the area, and seeing it thru
my memory, comparing n contrasting. I was as mild as Perry Como.
That merchant was in
NO danger. His head did not hit the cement.
All travon had to do was
BE NICE. His death directly resulted from
conduct inconsistent with niceness. It did.
firefly wrote:And he has continued to display impaired judgment and poor impulse control,
particularly when it comes to guns....except now it's against white women,
who he has been terrorizing with his threats of gun use.
As far as I know,
these are all
naked accusations, un-proven. Maybe u have proof
that I don 't know about.
firefly wrote:And now he's the one accused of stealing someone's property--his mother-in-law has alleged
he stole $4000+ worth of property from the home he rented from her,
in addition to defacing the interior of the home.
Anyone can accuse anyone of anything.
firefly wrote:And even a Chief of Police considers this man a significant threat to the community.
Every other living citizen might possibly harm the community; sometimes thay do.
That 's just part of life on Earth.
Does anyone 's rights depend upon the admiration of the police, or their
chief ?
firefly wrote:I don't think "Zimmy" will be up for any good citizen awards in the foreseeable future...
Agreed, but his anti-burglary patrol was a very kind and generous
thing for him to do freely with no recompense.
(Because of my
laziness added to the fact that my gated community
has no complaints of burglary whatsoever) I 'd not join in this myself,
but if naborhoods across America took up
strolling patrols of homeowners at nite,
burglars wud be very frustrated; thay wanna work in privacy.
Is it wise to accomodate them ?
David