@firefly,
DAVID wrote:Was he no threat and trying to get away while he was beating Zimmy 's head on the street??
firefly wrote:There is absolutely no evidence to support that that even occurred.
That assertion is false.
There was at least 1 witness to that effect; a resident.
I think that there were 2, but I 'm not sure.
firefly wrote:No blood on the street,
Was there trial testimony on that point?
firefly wrote:no swellings or goose eggs on the back of Zimmerman's head,
We all know that he
bled from the back of his head.
We 've all seen the pictures of him when the police brought him in.
firefly wrote:no DNA from Zimmerman on Martin's hands,
Do u allege that
ALL contact leaves DNA??
If I shake hands with u, will that leave DNA??
firefly wrote:not even under the fingernails.
Was scratching alleged by either side??
I don t believe that it was.
firefly wrote: And Zimmerman neither complained of, nor sought, treatment for symptoms of head trauma.
From his
bleeding, we
KNOW
that there was rear head trauma.
firefly wrote:Counselor, where is your evidence that "Zimmy's" head was beaten on the street?
It is hereinabove set forth (q.v.)
firefly wrote:Are you taking the word of a known liar?
Yes. On the day that we stop doing that,
we will relinquish any further witness testimony.
Coud the fullness of
YOUR life withstand
un-limited,
fully in-depth inquiry qua whether u have
EVER told a lie???
If all of your past & present friends, relatives, enemies, competitors, co-workers, fellow students
and all of the paperwork of your life including all applications for jobs or for loans, etc. were
subjected to un-limited analysis, woud thay show u to be immaculately,
meticulously, infinitely, forthright & perfectly accurate ?
Even
SUPERMAN did not tell the truth about being Clark Kent.
firefly wrote:And we know Zimmerman lied to the court and his lawyer
about both his assets and his second passport.
However that may be, it is
irrelevant to the litigated issues.
David