@firefly,
firefly wrote:
Quote:I do not think that Zimmerman slug his father in law in the face however.
Is that just wishful thinking on your part?
His father-in-law did have a mark on his nose.
Quote:and the domestic laws was written not to cover child abused or conflicts
between a man and his father in law but mainly partners violence.
The domestic violence laws cover incidents between family members.
That includes a man and his father-in-law. And, in the past, George
and Shellie Zimmerman had lived with her father--as a family.
As usual, you don't know what you are talking about.
This incident on Monday would come under domestic violence law.
The leftists in this forum want to
DEMONIZE
Zimmy, calumniating him as much as possible.
No matter what he did (if anything) to his father-in-law 's nose,
nor what he will do to it in the future
:
any citizen of Florida
remains free to kill, lawfully in self defense.
The leftists
hate that because thay want the Individual
to depend upon the
COLLECTIVE, by its hireling government,
for the very
existence of the Individual.
That is indicative of the
fundamental point in philosophical dispute.
"Gun control" is not about guns; its about
political control.
The motive of "gun control" is to subvert personal liberty,
in favor of greater power for the State.
Liberals, mentally and emotionally, favor
authoritarianism
in a collectivist direction, along with Stalin, Mao n Hitler.
In the emotions of liberals, government supplants Mommy & Daddy
as absolute monarchs from the cradle to the grave
and we must owe our allegiance to
them (Mom, Dad & Government)
NOT
to self-reliance nor to Individualism nor to liberty.
The liberals yearn for an America that is different
than that of Francis Scott Key; thay
reject him.
Liberals prefer that America be the "Land of the Docile"
and the Home of the Obedient" to government.
From that notion
: I dissent.
David
