27
   

The State of Florida vs George Zimmerman: The Trial

 
 
OmSigDAVID
 
  2  
Wed 11 Sep, 2013 07:05 pm
@firefly,
firefly wrote:
It's also interesting that, although the police managed not to find Zimmerman's gun on Monday, it was O'Mara who gave interviews attesting to the fact that Zimmerman did have a gun, holstered on his person, and that he had touched it through his shirt, and that, when the police arrived, it was in Zimmerman's vehicle.

So, O'Mara was indirectly supporting what Shellie Zimmerman said when she called 911.



O'Mara is through covering for him.
Sounds like a TERRIFIC lawyer, right????

Every defendant will surely want one of HIM.
BillRM
 
  1  
Wed 11 Sep, 2013 07:16 pm
@Moment-in-Time,
Quote:
I'm beginning to suspect there is something amiss in the way you post. Are you on medication?


LOL
0 Replies
 
BillRM
 
  1  
Wed 11 Sep, 2013 07:19 pm
@OmSigDAVID,
I am surprise that he did not wish to keep on the wagon train as there are a number of suits or settlements that would likely bring $$$$$$ upcoming.

Of course the 911 editing case could had already been settle for that matter.
firefly
 
  0  
Wed 11 Sep, 2013 07:23 pm
@BillRM,
Quote:
Of course the 911 editing case could had already been settle for that matter.

No, it hasn't been settled. But the lead attorney on that is a lawyer from Pennsylvania.
Quote:
I am surprise that he did not wish to keep on the wagon train...

That "wagon train" is a train wreck...

O'Mara got tired of being made a part of it.
0 Replies
 
BillRM
 
  1  
Wed 11 Sep, 2013 07:24 pm
@OmSigDAVID,
Quote:
it was O'Mara who gave interviews attesting to the fact that Zimmerman did have a gun, holstered on his person, and that he had touched it through his shirt, and that, when the police arrived, it was in Zimmerman's vehicle.


David if true that something that a lawyer could get disbarred for is it not for revealing?
firefly
 
  0  
Wed 11 Sep, 2013 07:31 pm
@BillRM,
No, lawyers don't get disbarred for that sort of thing. It's not illegal.

If a lawyer violates a confidential communication he can get sued for malpractice by his client. He can also be accused of a professional ethical violation.

Now you're going to claim Zimmerman is being victimized by O'Mara? Laughing

Poor George Zimmerman, everyone victimizes him.Laughing

I suspect that Zimmerman's possession of a gun on Monday was not confidential information.

How come you're not disturbed by the fact that Zimmerman stole and destroyed property on Monday, BillRM, and that he was trying to destroy incriminating evidence against him.

You still see him as an "outstanding citizen"? Laughing

0 Replies
 
firefly
 
  1  
Wed 11 Sep, 2013 08:04 pm
Quote:
Police: Zimmerman domestic dispute probe on hold until new evidence surfaces

LAKE MARY, Fla. — The investigation of a domestic dispute between George Zimmerman and his estranged wife is on hold because there is no clear evidence to charge anyone and neither side wants to press the case, a police spokesman said Wednesday.

That could change if new evidence surfaces or technicians are able to extract video that recorded the dispute from Shellie Zimmerman’s smashed iPad, said Officer Zach Hudson. Law enforcement analysts are having difficulty obtaining the video because the iPad is in bad shape, he said...

A police report on the dispute released Wednesday shed some light on how it started.

Shellie Zimmerman, accompanied by her father and a friend, was removing some belongings from the couple’s house when George Zimmerman, who still lives there, arrived and began taking photos of her, the report said. The house is owned by Shellie Zimmerman’s parents.

George Zimmerman recorded the items she removed from the house and also the belongings she had placed in her father’s truck, the report said.

Zimmerman said his wife was “taking property that was not agreed upon and he began taking pictures and recording the items,” the report said.

Shellie Zimmerman then took her iPad and started recording her husband taking photos of her, authorities said. George Zimmerman went in the house and locked the front door.

What happened next is in dispute.

Shellie Zimmerman told investigators she heard her father screaming from the garage. Her father, David Dean, told her that Zimmerman had hit him in the face, the report said. She said her husband then smashed her iPad.

During a 911 call, she also told police that George Zimmerman was threatening her and her father with a gun. Later, however, she said she had not seen a gun. Police said they found no gun, but that Shellie Zimmerman’s father “did have a swollen red mark on the bridge of his nose.”

At a news conference late Wednesday, Shellie Zimmerman was with her attorney, Kelly Sims, but didn’t answer any questions about what happened. Sims cited the on-going divorce proceedings and probation as the reason. Sims defended his client’s initial assertions that her husband was armed.

Sims said Shellie Zimmerman found packaging for a new holster in the trash that day and has always known him to carry a gun.

“Bottom line, Shellie had every reason to believe there was a gun,” Sims said.

Sims said his client is hoping to move on as soon as possible.

“The only thing Shellie wants out of the end of this relationship is for it to end with a whimper and not a bang,” Sims said.

In the report George Zimmerman told investigators that his wife had told him she was done picking up her belongings. He said he locked the front door and went to the garage to close it when Shellie Zimmerman’s father confronted him, according to the report.

Shellie Zimmerman’s father threw down his glasses and charged his son-in-law, according to George Zimmerman’s account. Shellie Zimmerman at some point hit her husband with her iPad, George Zimmerman told investigators.

Police officers asked George Zimmerman to remove his shirt so they could see if there were marks on his back. “There were no signs of trauma, redness or marks of any kind in the area where he said he was struck,” the report said.

As many as seven people were at the house — friends of the Zimmermans — and they all have been questioned by investigators, Hudson said. The friends said they didn’t see what happened and footage from the house’s surveillance cameras was inconclusive, Hudson added.

Both sides are refusing to press charges, but Florida law allows police officers to arrest someone for domestic violence without the consent of the victim...

http://www.washingtonpost.com/national/ipad-video-key-in-george-zimmerman-domestic-dispute-case-with-his-estranged-wife/2013/09/11/0f68c562-1ac0-11e3-80ac-96205cacb45a_story.html

0 Replies
 
Moment-in-Time
 
  1  
Wed 11 Sep, 2013 08:06 pm
@firefly,
Quote:

Quote:
Billrm, I'm beginning to suspect there is something amiss in the way you post....
All we see is the written word but some time there is more behind just a poster's inability to articulate his message effectively


firefly wrote:
Quote:
Sometimes there is more behind it. Like DrunkDrunkDrunk


You might know better than I, Firefly, since you've exchanged posts with him longer; however, I do suspect there is something more complex at play here. You're aware there are disparate posters among us, some with dyslexia, mental disorders, and a myriad of issues dealing with the mind. Not all maladjusted individuals stay away from computers, and on the whole, the Internet has become the link to the world for many of these people. We can only fathom something is abnormal from the messages they post. Sometimes it is strong medication that play a role. I've discovered through the years of posting there are posters with issues, both mentally and emotionally who are frequently clear in some areas and ass-backwards in others.
BillRM
 
  2  
Wed 11 Sep, 2013 08:13 pm
@Moment-in-Time,
Quote:
I've discovered through the years of posting there are posters with issues, both mentally and emotionally who are frequently clear in some areas and ass-backwards in others.


LOL to both you and my girlfriend Firefly.

footnote once more over the years Firefly had charge me with being a drunk, a drunk driver,a CP collector/pedophile, a would be rapist and or rapist and I just know I am leaving out a lot of other charges that are not at the moment coming to my mind.

One might just wonder who is the one on drugs and or who have mental health problems.......LOL
firefly
 
  1  
Wed 11 Sep, 2013 08:17 pm
A slightly different version of Monday's events...
Quote:
Zimmerman Domestic Dispute About Wife's 'Flying Away,' Her Lawyer Says
Sept. 11, 2013
By SENI TIENABESO and MICHAEL S. JAMES

A confrontation between George Zimmerman and his estranged wife may have escalated into a domestic dispute involving police Monday after he realized she was "flying away," her lawyer told reporters today.

A police report released earlier today had suggested a different scenario, noting that Shellie Zimmerman returned to the couple's Lake Mary, Fla., home and George Zimmerman claimed she was "taking property that was not agreed upon and he began taking pictures and recording the items."

But Shellie Zimmerman's attorney, Kelly Sims, seemed to disagree, saying, "There wasn't any dispute over items. There was maybe a dispute over somebody ... finally spreading her wings and saying, 'I'm flying away.'

"Shellie's desire is to stay as far as away from him as she can for the rest of her days," Sims added. "She lost about 30 pounds since she left George, so things are going great."

George Zimmerman rose to public attention as a neighborhood watch captain who admitted he fatally shot Trayvon Martin, an unarmed teen, during a confrontation in February 2012. He was found not guilty in the death in June, and Shellie Zimmerman claims she separated from him about a month later.

"Her marriage wasn't going great at the time this happened with Trayvon," Sims told reporters today.

"Shellie wants this relationship to end with a whimper, not a bang," Sims said.

Shellie Zimmerman, who filed for divorce last week, told cops the incident began when she arranged to pick up her belongings at the home, according to the police report.

Sims said his client did not expect her husband to be at the house, and released text messages today that seemed to show the Zimmermans coordinating the retrieval of items without his presence.

According to the police report, however, her husband arrived with a woman in the passenger seat and started taking pictures. As a result, Shellie Zimmerman said she also started recording on her iPad and then called her attorney.

George Zimmerman told police that he came to the home to ensure that his wife was getting the property agreed upon by their attorneys.

Shellie Zimmerman told police her husband stuck his arm inside her father's truck and she told him that he was not allowed inside. A dispute ensued and she claimed he grabbed the iPad.

After destroying the device, George Zimmerman reached his hand into his shirt to what she "assumed was a gun," she told police, adding that George Zimmerman told her father to "step closer."

She said her father then told her husband, "What are you going to do, shoot me?"

Samantha Schelbe, who was in the passenger seat of George Zimmerman's car, was "visibly shaken" by the ordeal, police said. Schelbe told police George Zimmerman never touched anyone and said that there were guns in the vehicle but that they had concealed weapons permits for them...

http://abcnews.go.com/US/investigators-zimmerman-domestic-dispute-unable-extract-video-wifes/story?id=20227863


I thought that George Zimmerman wasn't supposed to be there when his wife came on Monday. He did show up unexpectedly. His behavior is what did provoke the entire incident.

This man just can't control himself...
OmSigDAVID
 
  1  
Wed 11 Sep, 2013 08:21 pm
@BillRM,
Quote:
it was O'Mara who gave interviews attesting to the fact that Zimmerman did have a gun,
holstered on his person, and that he had touched it through his shirt, and that,
when the police interviews, it was in Zimmerman's vehicle.
BillRM wrote:
David if true that something that a lawyer could get disbarred for is it revealing?
I cannot speak definitively on that point, yet.
That seems un-likely to be anything that a defense lawyer 'd wanna
reveal about his client, for no reason.

To my mind, O'Mara's ministrations have been un-impressive.
Let 's wait and see what evolves b4 reaching a conclusion.





David
BillRM
 
  1  
Wed 11 Sep, 2013 08:23 pm
@BillRM,
Here is a more complete list of Firefly charges over the year.

Stand marijuana should be legal……………..............You are a pot head.

08 BAC limit for drunk driving is too low……..........You are a drunk driver

Sentencing for CP is too harsh in US………............. You are a pedophile

Adult women should not normally be able to
claim rape due to their own drinking
by reason of lack of valid consent………............…….You are a rapist
.
A woman should not be ruin based
mainly on the used of the n word decades
ago………………………………………………...............……You are a racist

You think that people should take
more computer security measures able
to block even the government from
viewing your computer files and
communications…………………………................…You are a lawbreaker of some
.................................................................... kind and or wish to aid such
.................................................................... people including cp traders

You are a supporter of the second
Amendment and have a CC license………….........You are a gun nut and a
....................................................................... danger to society
BillRM
 
  1  
Wed 11 Sep, 2013 08:28 pm
@OmSigDAVID,
Quote:
That seems un-likely to be anything that a defense lawyer 'd wanna
reveal about his client, for no reason.


It seems very strange given that lawyers normally tell their clients not to share information with the police or make public statements no matter how innocent you might feel and I see no useful purpose for a lawyer to open his mouth in an interview over what a client would have told him in such a situation.
firefly
 
  1  
Wed 11 Sep, 2013 08:32 pm
@BillRM,
Quote:
Here is a more complete list of Firefly charges over the year.

Quote me directly--from the posts where I drew those alleged conclusions. Otherwise, everyone will know these are your usual lies and distortions.

You flatter yourself that I'd give you that much thought. Laughing

You'll say anything to distract and avoid addressing George Zimmerman's recent behavior...
0 Replies
 
OmSigDAVID
 
  1  
Wed 11 Sep, 2013 08:34 pm
@BillRM,
BillRM wrote:

Quote:
That seems un-likely to be anything that a defense lawyer 'd wanna
reveal about his client, for no reason.


It seems very strange given that lawyers normally tell their clients not to share information with the police or make public statements no matter how innocent you might feel and I see no useful purpose for a lawyer to open his mouth in an interview over what a client would have told him in such a situation.
Your points are well taken, Bill. I agree.





David
0 Replies
 
firefly
 
  1  
Wed 11 Sep, 2013 08:41 pm
Quote:
Would It Have Been Legal to Shoot and Kill George Zimmerman?
Abby Ohlheiser
Sep 10, 2013

Yesterday, Shellie Zimmerman told a 911 operator that her husband George "was going to shoot" her and her father at their Florida home. "I'm really, really afraid," she added. And while the incident did not end in violence — nor has anyone been charged as the facts are still sorted out — Shellie's panicked 911 call poses an obvious question: would Florida law have offered Shellie the same defense had she used lethal force against her husband, as George used after he shot and killed 17-year-old Trayvon Martin?

This, to be clear, is a hypothetical situation: unlike Trayvon Martin, both Zimmermans are around to tell their version of events and we're learning quite a bit about what happened — including that Shellie Zimmerman's story has changed since her initial 911 call. Shellie and her father declined to press charges, and it turns out that police weren't able to find a gun on Zimmerman, or at the scene of the dispute. And we may never know who was telling the truth: George Zimmerman smashed an iPad allegedly used by Shellie Zimmerman to record the whole thing.

But what if Monday's incident had escalated? What if Shellie or her father got hold of a gun to defend themselves? If the situation had gone differently and Shellie had used a gun to shoot George — and George had not survived — one of the last records would have been Shellie's 911 call. George would not be around to give his side of the story. You can listen to the whole thing here, but this is the key point in which Shellie claimed George was armed and threatening her and her father:

Police: Is he inside now?

Shellie: No, he is in his car and he continually has his hand on his gun and he keeps saying step closer and he is just threatening all of us.

Police: Step closer and what?

Shellie: And he is doing to shoot us.

Police: OK.

Shellie: He punched my dad on the nose. My dad has a mark on his face. I saw his glasses were on the floor. He accosted my father and then took my iPad out of my hand and smashed it and cut it with a pocket knife. There is a Lake Mary city worker across the street that I believe saw almost all of it. He is sitting in his truck right now. He just showed up here but my phone died so I had to call from my father's phone. I'm really, really afraid.

Police: We have units in the area where you are at so just stay on the line with me.

Shellie: I don't know what he is capable of. I'm just really scared.

For comparison, you can read the transcript of George Zimmerman's 911 call before he engaged Martin. He started by saying "This guy looks like he's up to no good, or he's on drugs or something," and later added "Yeah, now he's coming towards me. … He's got his hand in his waistband."

So, under the scenario Shellie initially described to police, would Florida law permit her to shoot and kill George Zimmerman? Elizabeth Megale, a Savannah College associate professor who's written about stand your ground and self-defense laws in the state for years, told The Atlantic Wire that Shellie would have a good chance of walking free. "There are a couple of things going for her," Megale said, "They were at the house, so there's actually, in Florida, an even broader protection in your home," if it was proven that Shellie and her father had residency. Shellie filed for divorce from George days ago, and the home is owned by her parents, one of whom was involved in the incident yesterday. If Shellie and her father were established as the residents of the home, they would have been "afforded a presumption of reasonable fear" against George Zimmerman, entitling them to defend themselves with lethal force. And if it's arguable that Zimmerman was entering the home unlawfully, police will start with that presumption, Megale added, which would make it incredibly difficult for Shellie or her dad to face charges.

On the other hand, it appears that George, and not Shellie, was living at the home they used to share at the time of the incident. She was stopping by to pick up some belongings. So even without the presumption afforded to her by the first part of the law, if it was established that George had a right to be there, Shellie or her father would still have "no duty to retreat" if "he or she reasonably believed it was necessary to do so to prevent death or great bodily harm to himself or herself or another." If that sounds familiar, it's because it's the same self-defense provision invoked by George Zimmerman in his trial.

Because George and Martin were in the street, George had to provide evidence to the police in order to establish his reasonable fear from Martin — including the lacerations he sustained. Megale mentioned the case of John Tabutt for comparison, a 62-year-old Florida man who shot and killed his own fiancée in their home the night before their marriage. Tabutt said that the thought his fiance was an intruder. A grand jury declined to press manslaughter charges against him. "There are tons of cases," Megale said, "where there's no evidence of a break-in, but the shooter is awarded the presumption of reasonable fear anyway."

There's a contrasting comparison to make here, too: Marissa Alexander, also of Florida, was convicted and sentenced to 20 years in prison after she fired a warning shot towards her abusive husband Gray Rico in what she says was self defense. Rico, who survived, disputed his wife's version of events, and a judge denied her immunity under stand your ground. So maybe the real lesson here is that Florida's laws work best if there's no one else around to dispute the story.

http://www.theatlanticwire.com/national/2013/09/would-it-have-been-legal-shoot-and-kill-george-zimmerman/69257/



And George Zimmerman did have a gun with him on Monday, which would have helped to justify that reasonable fear of him...
Moment-in-Time
 
  5  
Wed 11 Sep, 2013 09:15 pm
@BillRM,
Quote:

One might just wonder who is the one on drugs and or who have mental health problems.......LOL


From every post I've read written by firefly, she is highly intelligent, articulate with ethics above reproach; you, however, come across as someone maintaining fixed false beliefs even when confronted with hard to deny facts....you dwell in stereotypes; your writings appear spaced out without much clarity. You appear almost delusional with your infantile writings. But of course if you're handicapped in some manner then of course I withdraw my censure.
Moment-in-Time
 
  3  
Wed 11 Sep, 2013 09:33 pm
@firefly,
Quote:


I thought that George Zimmerman wasn't supposed to be there when his wife came on Monday. He did show up unexpectedly. His behavior is what did provoke the entire incident.

This man just can't control himself...


I watched the Lawrence O'Donnell's show with Joy Reid, MSNBC contributor. She said the house was owned by Shellie's father and that George and she lived there until she left him. Reid said Shellie had separated from George, moving out before the trial, leaving George still living in her father's house. It seems the reality that is tying them together right now is the money from the Web account set up by George.....the two of them are living off that money since George is not working and neither is she. It seemed before the shooting of Trayvon Martin, the two had marital problems and this did not begin as a result of the killing of Trayvon.
BillRM
 
  -1  
Wed 11 Sep, 2013 10:12 pm
@Moment-in-Time,
Quote:
It seemed before the shooting of Trayvon Martin, the two had marital problems and this did not begin as a result of the killing of Trayvon.


Yes indeed, the constant fear of being killed by some nut beside dealing with the legal system did not cause any stress on the marriage!!!!!!!!!!!!

Next I do not see how the funds people given to Zimmerman would be consider marriage assets or let me put it this way when I wrote my check I did not think of his wife having a claim to the money I was sending to his defense fund.

Also I do not see how any settlement with the assholes for example that broadcast an edit 911 tape would also come under share assets.

If those are indeed not marriage assets she might be cutting her own throat by divorcing him.

Not that I do not feel sorry for both of them in any case as a great wrong had been done to them both in my opinion and that wrong had been done in the public name by the government which made it far worst.

0 Replies
 
BillRM
 
  -1  
Wed 11 Sep, 2013 10:38 pm
@Moment-in-Time,
Quote:
with ethics above reproach;


Bullshit she is a snake in human form in fact calling her a snake is an insult to all snakehood.

Let see my very very favorite example of her having no ethics at all of any type is when she edit a sarcastic comment of mine dealing with her asking me if I trade child porn or not when I dared to share and supported the opinion of the majority of federal judges that the punishment guide lines for that crime is too harsh at the federal level.

My full sarcastic comment to her follow "yes I trade child porn with federal judges"

Her edit version of my comment "yes I trade child porn" leaving out the with federal judges part for some strange reason.

Then with great joy declaring that I had admitted to this sick crime.

Not to mention whenever you dare to disagree with her on any subject you must therefore be evil itself.

.08 is too low of a cut off point for DUI and .1 make more sense......you must be a drunk driver.

Women are adults and as adults when they get themselves voluntarily under the influence of alcohol or drugs then they are still responsible for their own actions be those actions driving or having sex. It is highly unfair to their partners to allow women who regret the sex the next day or the next year to cry rape due to invalid consent......... You must be a rapist to have that opinion.

She is a sick and evil person at least in my opinion......... Drunk
0 Replies
 
 

Related Topics

 
Copyright © 2025 MadLab, LLC :: Terms of Service :: Privacy Policy :: Page generated in 0.08 seconds on 07/17/2025 at 02:32:06