@Frank Apisa,
OmSigDAVID wrote:
RABEL222 wrote:Quote: did the state try to loose the case?)
I have thought so from the start of this case. With the connivance of the Judge.
Nothing paranoid about
U,
is there RABEL ?
RABEL222 wrote:And the people on this site who have promoted the lies about Travon will continue with lies about Shelly
because they are unable to admit they were wrong
about saint George.
St. George killed the dragon !
We were not rong about Zimmy.
He
STILL had as much right to kill travon
for beating his head on the street, regardless of his wife.
David
Frank Apisa wrote:
David...you are assuming Trayvon beat Zimmerman's head on the street.
No. I am not "assuming".
I simply believe Zimmy 's explanation of the nite 's events.
I see no reason to reject his explanation.
Frank Apisa wrote:All we really have first hand is Zimmerman's account.
What 's rong with
THAT??
If I were in Zimmy 's position,
I 'd want a jury to believe
ME. I believe Zimmy.
His explanation is
1OO% plausible.
parados wrote: And even if some beating was being done...
you are assuming it was not provoked by Zimmerman...
Again, that 's not "assuming"; its accepting his explanation.
The burden of proof is on the affirmative side, not on Zimmy.
parados wrote:who is getting a track record of being an initiator of these kinds of things.
That 's OK.
Whatever ever happens after the event is not relevant to its cause.
David