The State of Florida vs George Zimmerman: The Trial

@firefly,

firefly wrote:

Quote:
But for the hell of it here is the true picture of that child not the smiling one of him many years earlier in his life.

Exactly what do you think those allegedly "true pictures" show about that child?

Thay show the mis-characterization of that low life street thug
as being a "child" (in the normal sense).

2 Replies

@OmSigDAVID,

Quote:

Thay show the mis-characterization of that low life street thug
as being a "child" (in the normal sense).

How do those photos show that? How do they show he is not "a child"?

1 Reply

@firefly,

firefly wrote:

Quote:
Thay show the mis-characterization of that low life street thug
as being a "child" (in the normal sense).

How do those photos show that? How do they show he is not "a child"?

The frase "a child" bears some connotations
that r inconsistent with the depictions; its subjective. (U knew that, right ?)

2 Replies

@OmSigDAVID,

Quote:

The frase "a child" bears some connotations
that r inconsistent with the depictions; its subjective. (U knew that, right ?)

What's your "subjective" definition of "a child"? And how are the images in those photos inconsistent with such a definition?

1 Reply

@OmSigDAVID,

OmSigDAVID wrote:

that r inconsistent with the depictions; its subjective. (U knew that, right ?)

Firefly has a long record of mis-using language in the pursuit of winning arguments. she is fundamentally dishonest.

2 Replies

@hawkeye10,

Quote:

Firefly has a long record of mis-using language in the pursuit of winning arguments. she is fundamentally dishonest.

If you were more articulate, you'd know I don't misuse language.

Your jealousy is palpable. As is your envy. Laughing

1 Reply

@firefly,

firefly wrote:

Quote:
Firefly has a long record of mis-using language in the pursuit of winning arguments. she is fundamentally dishonest.

If you were more articulate, you'd know I don't misuse language.

Your jealousy is palpable. As is your envy.

Firefly language is interesting, but in English it is "disgust".

0 Replies

http://media.cagle.com/89/2013/07/23/135009_600.jpg

1 Reply

@firefly,

firefly wrote:

Quote:
The frase "a child" bears some connotations
that r inconsistent with the depictions; its subjective. (U knew that, right ?)

What's your "subjective" definition of "a child"? And how are the images in those photos inconsistent with such a definition?

I refer to its connotation; its a gentle innocence of very early youth.

David

1 Reply

@firefly,

firefly wrote:

I dissent from the allegation of your cartoon.
Standing your ground when attacked (as distinct from turning your back and running away)
is different than chasing after criminals in the streets, to grab them, as a vigilante.

David

0 Replies

@cicerone imposter,

cicerone imposter wrote:

Great accomplishment for all Zimmerman revisionists; kill children with a gun.

Yes, when thay are beating your head against the street.

0 Replies

@OmSigDAVID,

Quote:

I refer to its connotation; its a gentle innocence of very early youth.

The sort of "gentle innocence of very early youth" you had when you possessed a gun for self protection? Laughing

1 Reply

@firefly,

firefly wrote:

Quote:
I refer to its connotation; its a gentle innocence of very early youth.

The sort of "gentle innocence of very early youth" you had when you possessed a gun for self protection?

YES. I was gently innocent with my revolvers.
I never even shot a rabbit; never threatened anyone.
Thay were only for self defense,
which did not actually become necessary for a few more decades
and a few 1OOO miles away from there; in the meantime,
thay were emotionally soothing.

Being gentle and being innocent is not the same as being helpless.

David

1 Reply

@OmSigDAVID,

Quote:

YES. I was gently innocent with my revolvers.
I never even shot a rabbit.
Thay were only for self defense...

thay were emotionally soothing

Interesting pacifiers you had, David.
Lovely depiction you present of the "gentle innocence of very early youth".

http://www.capoliticalreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2013/03/guns-assault-rifles.jpg

1 Reply

@firefly,

firefly wrote:

Quote:
YES. I was gently innocent with my revolvers.
I never even shot a rabbit.
Thay were only for self defense...

thay were emotionally soothing

Interesting pacifiers you had, David.
Lovely depiction you present of the "gentle innocence of very early youth".

Thank u, Firefly.

When I acquired my gun collection,
I did not experience "fear, rage [??????]
paranoia, hate, nor terror" except insofar
as I knew that the commies were out to get us.
Ronald Reagan eventually took care of that.

David

1 Reply

@OmSigDAVID,

I had a high school social studies teacher who called them "commie-fags".....he also claimed to be a card carrying member of the John Birch Society but when I asked to see it after class one day he refused so who knows, maybe it was all educational provocation.

1 Reply

@hawkeye10,

hawkeye10 wrote:

I had a high school social studies teacher who called them "commie-fags".....
he also claimed to be a card carrying member of the John Birch Society
but when I asked to see it after class one day he refused so who knows,
maybe it was all educational provocation.

Maybe; in fairness to the communist slavemasters:
we have no reason to attribute any greater degree
of homosexuality to communist slaves, nor to their masters.

It feels really GOOD
to contemplate n to reflect upon the death of metastatic communist slavery.

I never joined the John Birch Society, tho a lot of my good friends
were members. I deemed some of the allegations of Robert Welsch
to have been extreme and un-reliable, tho he had his heart in the right place.

David

0 Replies

@OmSigDAVID,

Quote:

Thay show the mis-characterization of that low life street thug
as being a "child" (in the normal sense).

Of course they did and the desire to do so resulted in the so call news media picking a picture of the young hoodlum dating back many years.

Can not show him as a full growth male doing illegal acts now can we as that does not fit the picture of a poor child gun down for no reason.

Of course they needed to also painted a picture of a mixed race Latin male as a white racist also and the hell with the facts going as far as editing the 911 tape.

1 Reply

@hawkeye10,

Quote:

Firefly has a long record of mis-using language in the pursuit of winning arguments. she is fundamentally dishonest.

She should get a job with CBS who had shown they love such people as employees, as I can see her right at home editing that 911 tape or digging up a picture of Trayvon showing him as a harmless child.

1 Reply

@BillRM,

BillRM wrote:

Quote:
Firefly has a long record of mis-using language in the pursuit of winning arguments. she is fundamentally dishonest.

She should get a job with CBS who had shown they love such people as employees, as I can see her right at home editing that 911 tape or digging up a picture of Trayvon showing him as a harmless child.

If CBS truly "loves" people who screw up the English language, Bill...you should be a shoo-in for the job of president of the Network.

Wink

1 Reply

The State of Florida vs George Zimmerman: The Trial

Related Topics

Quick Links

My Account

able2know