27
   

The State of Florida vs George Zimmerman: The Trial

 
 
hawkeye10
 
  0  
Sun 25 Aug, 2013 10:07 pm
@firefly,
firefly wrote:

Quote:
the only hate I have noticed from bill is of idiots and liers....maybe you could show me something else?

If you've failed to notice it, that's not my problem, it's yours.

You are one of the biggest liers on A2K so your credibility is shall we say, lacking.
BillRM
 
  0  
Sun 25 Aug, 2013 10:10 pm
@hawkeye10,
Quote:
bill is of idiots and liers


Hell I do not even hate Firefly Hawkeye so I guess it take a lot more then being a liar to produce hate in me.
firefly
 
  0  
Sun 25 Aug, 2013 10:34 pm
@BillRM,
You don't produce hate, you ooze it...like pus.
0 Replies
 
RABEL222
 
  0  
Sun 25 Aug, 2013 10:34 pm
@hawkeye10,
Try rereading some of your posts.
0 Replies
 
firefly
 
  1  
Sun 25 Aug, 2013 10:52 pm
@hawkeye10,
Quote:
You are one of the biggest liers on A2K so your credibility is shall we say, lacking.

Really? I'm one of the biggest liers on A2K? Have you taken measurements on all of them?

lier (plural liers)
1.A person or thing that lies, in the sense of being horizontal.


No, I'm actually quite vertical, particularly when using a keyboard. I'm never a lier when I'm at A2K, I'm upright all of the time.

I guess that means that your credibility isn't very good...but we knew that already, didn't we?

hawkeye10
 
  2  
Sun 25 Aug, 2013 11:02 pm
@firefly,
your ability to yuk it up at least gives you enough entertainment value to make you interesting...kudos.
izzythepush
 
  1  
Mon 26 Aug, 2013 01:55 am
@BillRM,
BillRM wrote:
Hell I do not even hate Firefly Hawkeye so I guess it take a lot more then being a liar to produce hate in me.


Being a woman will do it.
0 Replies
 
izzythepush
 
  1  
Mon 26 Aug, 2013 02:00 am
@hawkeye10,
hawkeye10 wrote:
You are one of the biggest liers on A2K so your credibility is shall we say, lacking.


You've got none, you're an idiot. You hardly understand anything that's discussed on this forum, I've lost count of the number of times something has shot over your head. You really are an idiot, really. I'm not being nasty, I'm trying to help you understand. You're an idiot. You don't get things, a lot of things. You're an idiot.
0 Replies
 
BillRM
 
  0  
Mon 26 Aug, 2013 03:13 am
@hawkeye10,
Quote:
your ability to yuk it up at least gives you enough entertainment value to make you interesting...kudos.


To me Hawkeye she had reached the point where her comments and lies are not worth reading any longer and so I had placed her on ignore.
0 Replies
 
OmSigDAVID
 
  1  
Mon 26 Aug, 2013 08:22 am

In my opinion, we 'll be better off
if people will stop off-topic, un-solicited comments
regarding one another 's personal merits or shortcomings.





David
BillRM
 
  0  
Mon 26 Aug, 2013 08:28 am
@OmSigDAVID,
Quote:
if people will stop off-topic, un-solicited comments
regarding one another 's personal merits or shortcomings.


Sorry we are way pass that stage with Firefly having label me as a drunk, a drunk driver, a rapist or rapist what to be and a pedophila and on and on for daring to disagree with her over the years.

Even going so far as to edit comments of mine to supported her claims.

firefly
 
  1  
Mon 26 Aug, 2013 09:27 am
@BillRM,
No, what you've been deservedly labeled most often is an "idiot" and I definitely haven't been alone in calling you that. You've gotten that label more times, from more people, than any other member of A2K that I can think of. Even the owner of this site has referred to you as "the village idiot."

And it has little to do with disagreeing with ideas, your general attitudes, and your actual behavior and uncalled for comments toward other A2K posters, on a personal level, have been vile, contemptible, and hateful. A good example of that was what you said to cicerone imposter earlier in this thread.

I really wish you would put me on ignore. Your obsession with me is as sickening as everything else about you.
RABEL222
 
  1  
Mon 26 Aug, 2013 01:05 pm
@firefly,
I wonder if Hawk and Bill are related? They certainly express themselves the same way. They respond to facts with insults and back each other to the hilt in everything they say. Sounds to me like they had the same teachers.
hawkeye10
 
  3  
Mon 26 Aug, 2013 01:14 pm
@RABEL222,
you would get more accomplished if you consentrated on the ideas being discussed rather than fantasizing about the speakers.
firefly
 
  2  
Mon 26 Aug, 2013 01:46 pm
@hawkeye10,
Quote:
you would get more accomplished if you consentrated on the ideas being discussed rather than fantasizing about the speakers.

The fantasizing that's going on in this thread is mainly about the victim who was killed, and it's character assassination, of an extremely malicious nature, with racial overtones, and it's totally unrelated to any evidence the jury actually considered in this case, and it's unrelated to anything that George Zimmerman knew about his victim at the time.

And the people doing most of that fantasizing seem not to have actually watched the trial or followed it very closely.

They are certainly not familiar with most of the prosecution evidence that called into question the credibility of Zimmerman's version of events.

The criminal legal matter against George Zimmerman was settled with the jury verdict. But, without question, this was not a satisfactory verdict for many people in the public. Continuing to re-hash the specifics of this case won't resolve that. This specific case will be eventually forgotten, but some of the issues it has raised will continue to be discussed because it dovetails with other social issues of concern--including those relating to race.

That's essentially what Colin Powell said yesterday.
Quote:
Colin Powell: Trayvon Martin verdict 'questionable'
August 25, 2013

WASHINGTON (AP) — Former secretary of State Colin Powell called the jury verdict that cleared the killer of Florida teenager Trayvon Martin "questionable" and urged President Obama to speak more on issues of race

The first black chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff said on CBS's Face the Nation that the Martin verdict soon would be forgotten but said Obama — and all presidents — have a responsibility to discuss the nation's history of racial injustice. Powell spoke as Washington marked the 50th anniversary of Martin Luther King Jr.'s march that included the iconic "I Have a Dream" speech.

"If Dr. King was here, I'm quite sure he would say,
'Congratulations on all the progress that's been made, but let's keep going. The dream is not fully achieved yet,'" said Powell, also the first African American to serve the nation as secretary of state.

Asked about the Martin killing, Powell questioned its impact on the civil rights discourse. A Florida jury found George Zimmerman acted in self-defense and acquitted him during a criminal trial.

"I think that it will be seen as a questionable judgment on the part of the judicial system down there, but I don't know if it will have staying power," Powell said. "These cases come along and they blaze across the midnight sky and then after a period of time, they're forgotten."

That doesn't mean Obama should keep silent, though, Powell said.

"I'd like to see him be more passionate about race questions," Powell said of Obama, whom he endorsed during the 2008 and 2012 presidential election.

"For the president to speak out on it is appropriate. I think all leaders, black and white, should speak out on this issue," the Republican added.

Powell said he didn't fully grasp the civil rights upheaval happening during the early 1960s until he returned from Vietnam. His wife, Alma, didn't share the developments with him from their home in Birmingham, Ala., and his service blocked him from engaging in the political upheaval.

He said the civil rights era helped blacks but more needs to be done.

"A lot has been accomplished, and we should be so proud of our accomplishments," he said. "But at the same time, that mirror should show us that there are still problems in this country, that there is still racial bias that still exists in certain parts of our country."

http://www.usatoday.com/story/news/politics/2013/08/25/colin-powell-trayvon-martin-verdict/2697149/




0 Replies
 
OmSigDAVID
 
  1  
Mon 26 Aug, 2013 06:25 pm
@BillRM,
DAVID wrote:
Yes, indeed,
but travon gave us a lot to write about.
BillRM wrote:

He also make more money for his family,
in their settlement with the home owner association
than he would had been likely to had been able to earn or to steal in two lifetimes.
I hope that Zimmy can successfully sue
decedent 's estate for assault & for battery.





David
OmSigDAVID
 
  1  
Mon 26 Aug, 2013 06:36 pm
@Frank Apisa,
Frank Apisa wrote:

BillRM wrote:

Good luck in getting money out of a man for the crime of defending his life from a hoodlum.

But even the possibility is zero thanks to the SYG law protections.

Still it is a damn shame that there will be no law suit as I would love
all the **** we are aware of and likely even more would come out
in open court concerning saint Trayvon.


You really are a hateful man, Bill. You wanna work on that. Hate drags ya down.
I must AGREE with u, Frank
(except about Bill being "hateful").
Hate shud be avoided. After someone has put out the garbage,
there is no reason to hate the garbage.





David
0 Replies
 
BillRM
 
  1  
Mon 26 Aug, 2013 06:59 pm
@OmSigDAVID,
Quote:
I hope that Zimmy can successfully sue
decedent 's estate for assault & for battery.


The problem is that I would bet the money did not go to Tryvon estate but directly to his parents.

True his parents should not had raised a hoodlum but still as a non-lawyer I do not see any legal grounds to go after the settlement.

Zimmerman does have grounds for actions against CBS for editing the 911 tape and for the prosecutor for after the verdict calling him a murderer in my once more non-lawyer opinion.

RABEL222
 
  -2  
Mon 26 Aug, 2013 09:10 pm
@hawkeye10,
Quote:
you would get more accomplished if you consentrated on the ideas being discussed rather than fantasizing about the speakers.


Cant help myself when the speakers fantasize about the subject being discussed.
0 Replies
 
oralloy
 
  0  
Mon 26 Aug, 2013 09:40 pm
@BillRM,
BillRM wrote:
True his parents should not had raised a hoodlum but still as a non-lawyer I do not see any legal grounds to go after the settlement.

If the Martins are foolish enough to sue Mr. Zimmerman, according to Florida law they will then have to pay all his legal bills related to their lawsuit.
0 Replies
 
 

Related Topics

 
Copyright © 2024 MadLab, LLC :: Terms of Service :: Privacy Policy :: Page generated in 0.1 seconds on 11/17/2024 at 08:35:24