@Frank Apisa,
Quote:firefly wrote:
What was wrong was Zimmerman not remaining in his vehicle
Does it say that in the Owner's Manual??
I took it from the glove compartment,
but I did not see
THAT.
DAVID wrote:If there is any reason
that Zimmy shud have done that, then please tell us what it IS,
citing to any statutory or judicial authority in support.
Frank Apisa wrote:Because he was carrying a gun...
U
imply that:
Zimmy shud have left his gun in his car,
to make himself helpless, in case the suspected criminal attacks him,
to protect the suspected criminal, while he was attacking Zimmy ??
U reason that Zimmy shud have decided that:
"Hay, I might get into a life or death fight,
so I shud get rid of my gun, to
protect the guy who is trying to
KILL me!"
U mean that our goal shud be to
protect violent criminals,
by dis-arming ourselves, to weaken our defenses; yes ??
Frank Apisa wrote:and stalking a young man
In your vu,
"stalking" precedes
pouncing, does it?? (like a lion??)
Frank Apisa wrote:who may have been doing absolutely nothing wrong...
and who might detect that he was being stalked and react...and that might result in someone being shot.
A criminal being shot,
which is what happened. Zimmy made
MY life safer,
for which he has my admiration & my gratitude.
I hope to shake his hand and to give him a decent gun;
I have in mind a 2 inch .44 special revolver, loaded with hollowpointed slugs.
Frank Apisa wrote:Which is, essentially, what happened, David.
When a criminal is shot,
the good guys shud
cheer. Its not just that travon was
casing the place; its also that he was trying to murder Zimmy.
After having successfully fled the scene (out of Zimmy 's sight)
for several minutes, he returned and became violent with Zimmy.
Travon's criminality is
not open to guesswork.
Travon tried to kill Zimmy by pounding his head on the street.
Frank Apisa wrote:Zimmerman should have stayed in his car...
the police were on the way.
Do u wish to offer citation
to any statutory or common law in support of that proposition?
Do we all share a common passion to keep criminals intact?
I do
not suggest that we shud follow them
to punish them,
but if criminals attack, then the good guys are fully within
their rights to fight back, as Zimmy did.
Frank Apisa wrote:That is what Neighborhood Watch people are supposed to do.
Anyone can
suppose anything;
supposing something does
not create any moral imperative; yes ?
Next week, I can
suppose
that u r the King of Mars.