@RABEL222,
Quote:You are just one of those people who make up "facts" to fit what ever they think.
BillRM is not just making up facts, he's also denying all of the evidence that contradicts Zimmerman's version of events.
That's because he's really not interested in this particular case, except as it pertains to gun owners, gun rights, and gun laws--and in making sure that those things are not affected.
So, instead of dealing with the actual facts and evidence in this case, as they were presented in court, BillRM disregards it all. His version doesn't even jive with the defense case, as they presented it, because he's throwing in all sorts of things that were never mentioned or included in this trial. I'm of the impression he never even followed or watched the trial, nor does he seem to understand the verdict, and why it turned out that way.
BillRM is here only to promote the gun lobby/NRA position--why people need guns, why people are right in using those guns, why gun laws and self-defense laws that protect shooters shouldn't be changed, etc. That's why none of the actual facts in this case matter to him. That's why the victim has to be blamed for his own death--no error in judgment on Zimmerman's part can be acknowledged, and certainly no issues about whether lethal force was necessary can even be spoken about. For BillRM, this was clear, open and shut self-defense, which is not what the jurors felt, despite the verdict, because that's the scenario that best bolsters the gun lobby/NRA party line he's regurgitating.
Trying to get him to focus on the facts and evidence in this case,
all of the facts and evidence, is a waste of time. He's not interested in this case--except as it affects the gun lobby/NRA and his own gun use.