The State of Florida vs George Zimmerman: The Trial

you guys totally don't get what "neighborhood watch" is all about...

Baldimo wrote:

Martin defenders always seem to forget that it was Martin who threw the punch's which lead to the self-defense shooting.

And you know this how?

Oh this is a good one Frank. Please tell me how I have shown bigotry and racial enmity?

Everything that Frank Apisa says is always an absolute lie. If he accuses you of bigotry, be assured that the opposite is true.

A tragedy occurred…a young man guilty of nothing more than buying a few snacks and a drink was shot to death because of the confrontation.

Quote:

A tragedy occurred…a young man guilty of nothing more than buying a few snacks and a drink was shot to death because of the confrontation.

Odd as I remember the evidence showing that beside buying a few snacks on his way home he did his best to either killed or seriously harm Zimmerman and a jury found that to be the case.

Living in fantasy land it would seem once more Frank.

Like-minded jurors will arrive at a not guilty verdict by virtue of their bigotry

I said this before…and it bears repeating:

The people "defending" George Zimmerman here in this thread disgust me a great deal more than does George Zimmerman.. Zimmerman may actually have considered a young man in a hoodie as suspicious…and worked himself into a state where an attempt at confrontation seemed reasonable. A tragedy occurred…a young man guilty of nothing more than buying a few snacks and a drink was shot to death because of the confrontation.

But the lowlifes posting here should be way beyond that suspicion. Every presumption here should be that Trayvon bought some snacks and a drink…and was heading home to watch a basketball game.

The vilifying of him…the snarky remarks…the past history should disgust any reasonable person.

There may indeed have been no racial component to George Zimmerman’s initial actions that night…but the lowlifes posting here are filled with bigotry and racial enmity.

I’d tell them they should be ashamed of themselves for the direction their arguments has taken, but to be honest, it doesn’t sound as if any of them have the strength of character or ethical considerations to see they should be.

Pity them.

They barely qualify as human.

But the lowlifes posting here should be way beyond that suspicion. Every presumption here should be that Trayvon bought some snacks and a drink…and was heading home to watch a basketball game.

The people defending Zimmerman and vilifying Martin should hang their heads in shame.

But they do not have the strength of character or moral fiber to do so.

Hey...that's life.

According to Zimmerman's testimony!

Trayvon was unable to testify...he was dead.

Lighten up Frank.

A tragedy occurred…a young man guilty of nothing more than buying a few snacks and a drink was shot to death because of the confrontation.

Odd as I remember the evidence showing that beside buying a few snacks on his way home he did his best to either killed or seriously harm Zimmerman and a jury found that to be the case.

Living in fantasy land it would seem once more Frank.

cicerone imposter wrote:

Like-minded jurors will arrive at a not guilty verdict by virtue of their bigotry

An you know that those six women was bigotry by the fact they was not black or due to them coming up with a verdict that most legal experts seems to think was call for?

Still waiting for your proof of bigotry Frank.

What about those of us that don't give a **** about either of them but don't want to see this become something bigger where anti-gun proponents use it to further limit our rights under the second amendment?

...As you watched Travyon Martin’s father sit in Congress and set a 50-year time line for a law that would ban profiling and killing minors in self-defense in Florida – it was easy to forget the King Holiday took 15 years to pass....

....Trayvon’s Gift to the President

The tragic and confusing death of Trayvon Martin was a priceless opportunity for Eric Holder and his boss to divert pubic attention away from their bumbling ineptitude. Eric Holder had been the target of ridicule ever since he stupidly dumped truckloads of high-caliber firearms into border-town gun shops in the baseless hope that he could somehow track each gun from its straw buyer to some drug gang down in Mexico. Eric lost track of the guns which were used to slaughter about 300 Mexican citizens. Some of these guns came back across the border; two of them, AK-47 assault rifles, were found near the lifeless body of U.S. border Patrol Agent Brian Terry. Eric had called his clueless gun-dump Operation Fast & Furious.

Eric Holder had been Bill Clinton’s flunky on speed dial. When Hillary Clinton was running for a New York senate seat, Bill had the bright idea of garnering Puerto Rican votes for Hillary by freeing sixteen imprisoned Puerto Rican terrorists who had been convicted of bank robbery, sedition, conspiracy, the possession of explosives and murder. They were committed terrorists who had heartlessly carried on a bombing campaign in New York, Chicago, and elsewhere in the 1970s and 1980s. These homicidal jerks had been linked to over 130 bombings, several bank robberies, six murders and injuries to hundreds of American citizens. The FBI, federal prosecutors and other law-enforcement officials had opposed these commutations. None of the pleas from the injured, the maimed and the widowed victims of the FALN terrorists were poignant enough to temper Hillary Clinton’s blind ambition. The whole dirty deal was brokered by Eric Holder.

Trayvon Martin’s death came just in time to save Barack Obama from his worst nightmare – declining poll numbers. Libertarians and liberals alike were unhappy with Obama’s program of data mining the telephone and Internet histories of American citizens. These same people were dismayed by revelations that Obama’s IRS agents had selectively targeted Tea Party, conservative and constitutionalist groups for special scrutiny and abuse. Liberals and conservatives alike were troubled by Obama’s unwillingness to disclose the criteria he used to target people, some of them American citizens, for drone-strike assassinations. Even the New York Times had stopped being Obama’s obedient stenographer and was asking probing questions.

President Obama wanted to change the subject and Trayvon’s death was the perfect distraction. Obama’s soul mate, Rahm Emanuel, had taught Barack that, “You never want a serious crisis to go to waste,” so Obama re-imagined the tragic death in Florida as a “moral crisis” or possibly a “civil rights crisis.” It was an opportunity for Obama to exude empathy and reconnect with his political base on an emotional level that didn’t require too much pesky critical thinking.....