@firefly,
BillRM wrote:Oh I guess I am missing something by having Firefly on ignore
but then I guess I am not either by the quotes from her I am reading.
firefly wrote:Well, what you missed was my pointing out that you've been profiled as a pedophile in the past, when you were booted out of a park for enticing and engaging young children with kittens--a common animal lure used by pedophiles and child abductors--behavior on your part which alarmed other adults in the park who witnessed it, and they took action to get you out of that park.
I wonder if such a thing was
lawful,
if it was a public park. Cud thay have thrown him out, if he had AIDS??
firefly wrote:So, it's ironic that you now support the racial profiling of a black kid as a criminal, when all he was doing
was simply talking on his cell phone as he meandered on his way home from the store--in a place he had
a legitimate right to be.
Well, if he really
WAS
casing the place, pre-burglary, as Zimmy suspected, then it was OK. Yes??
firefly wrote:I don't know, or care, what kind of pictures Martin had on his phone--he was 3 weeks
beyond being 16, he was a kid, he acted like a kid.
Are u being
CONSISTENT in regard to your position on child porn,
Firefly ?
What does the federal statute say about
youthful possession of child porn ?
firefly wrote:Kids that age like to look at naked females.
I'm sure they all spend a lot of time looking at pictures of naked females.
Do u consider the child porn on Travon 's fone
to be
age appropriate ??
firefly wrote: You find that abnormal? Why do you care what was on his phone?
Well, there have been long discussions on A2K qua the merits
of legal limits on the First Amendment concerning child porn, right?
U advocated the absolute
Prohibitionists' position??
Did u change your mind ?
firefly wrote: He was a kid. And now he's dead.
You seem to get some perverse delight in trashing this kid's character.
The character of the attempted murderer with the child porn on his fone, right ?? Is that the kid??
firefly wrote:All he did was make a trip to 7/11 with no intention of bothering anyone that night--he bought his snacks and he was going home to watch the basketball game on TV. And, like a lot of kids, he was yakking on the phone with a friend, and dodging the rain, as he meandered home.
Was he casing the area, pre-burglary
during his meandering in the rain??
firefly wrote:He was a kid.
When someone of any age
is casing pre-burglary, his age shud not be considered.
When someone is beating his victim 's head against the street
that is a fine time to kill him, not to ascertain his age.
Kids have no right to burgle, nor to murder.
U don't seem to care about that. I do.
firefly wrote:You weren't a kid that day you got booted out of the park for behavior
with young children that other adults thought was inappropriate...you were a grown man...
Zimmerman was also a grown man, with a loaded gun,
If he had been stupid enuf to go around without that gun,
then he 'd have presumably been murdered by Travon.
That wud have saved Sharpton and his boy Obama a lot of concern.
firefly wrote: who followed a kid in the dark, for no adequate reason, he hadn't witnessed the kid doing anything illegal,
and he had already called the police to report this "suspicious" person.
It was a good idea to keep him under observation;
see what he does.
Your implication that there was some mysterious error in that is of no avail.
firefly wrote:He wasn't doing what a neighborhood watch should do by following the kid, particularly while carrying a gun, so what the hell was he doing?
In the exercise of personal wisdom, he was carrying a defensive gun
ALL THE TIME.
He was going out of his way to suppress burglary,
so that we can keep our stuff.
firefly wrote:And why didn't it ever cross his mind that his suspicions might be wrong, and that he was frightening
and menacing some innocent kid?
He was not dum enuf to believe that following was menacing.
Zimmy knew that he was well within his rights.
Its
GOOD to harass burglars; deny them the privacy thay need.
firefly wrote:Even after he knew the truth, that he had followed a high school kid who had a perfect right to be in that complex,
and that his screwed up judgment had resulted in that kid's death, this idiot said it was all, "God's plan."
SO WHAT if he did??
(I don't join in that opinion.)
firefly wrote:I can't imagine that many people really want to see Zimmerman able to carry a gun again...
The limits of your imagination
have
NO effect on the Constitutional rights of Zimmy.
I 'm trying to convince him to carry a compact .44 revolver instead of little 9mm.
I 'm thinking of giving him mine, for a present.
Maybe we can go to the gunnery range together.
I can probably replace it for less than $5OO.
firefly wrote:Although his life's really finished. I can't imagine
when it will be safe for him to ever come out of hiding...
Did u see the lawyer on HLN or on Fox News
who said that Zimmy might become a
LEGAL serial killer,
if a lot of vengeful blacks occasionally attack him
and if he kills them in self defense, as he did to Travon.
firefly wrote:so I don't think the world will ever see much of George Zimmerman again.
His life is over.
Zimmy will have a
HAPPY LIFE,
surrounded by 1OOOs of his new friends and putting out his books and movies.
He is destined to get
rich,
RICHER and
RICHEST!
David