Lightwizard wrote:If anything, this administration is well scripted. Well scripted as in fiction.
This kind of statement is as easy to make as it is empty of value.
Lightwizard wrote:I'm not refusing to be swayed from any particular postion. I just didn't find Rice's or any of the administration's spin as convincing.
Yes, but anything said or written that you perceive as harming Bush, you do "find convincing". Your only standard for what you perceive to be "true" seems to be whether you think it is good or bad for Bush. Not a very rational standard...
Caption fun:
1. "That's nothing...I once told a lie
this big..."
2. "I'm tellin' ya; Balls this big..."
"...and her son
really is the worst President ever."
Of what are you referring to? I don't believe either faction is completely lacking in facts. It's whether one wants to believe if the facts add up to a truth. With politicians, they have trained themselves (or in Bush's case, have been trained) to spin the facts in their favor (that's not so say they don't consciously tell a lie because they do). What is all this call to evidence that something is fiction? That's what the commission is looking for and none of us have that facility. As soon as they de-classify the documents in question, that will thrown some light on what is the truth. The public seldoms gets the whole truth from any politician until months and often years go by. That's what historians are for and you'll even find their assessments biased to their philosophy and idealism.
I thought you believed Condi...
