cicerone imposter wrote:
You are now resorting to a ridiculous side show.
No, ci...I am attempting to establish that some things I know. When I do not know something...I acknowledge that I do not know it. If I make guesses about it...I call them guesses; if I speculate about it...I call it speculation.
When I talk about something that I know...I say I know it.
I know (in a reasonable sense of the word "know") that 2 + 2 = 4; I know I am typing at my keyboard at the moment; I know the name on my birth certificate is "Frank Apisa."
I know that since REALITY is what actually IS...it objectively is what actually is.
Not sure why you want to insist I am doing the several things you have suggested I am doing.
Wouldn't it be easier to do what I have done so very often in the past...simply say that I do not know for sure?
The only way REALITY can be subjective is if this "belief" of yours that it is...IS CORRECT. And even if it is correct that REALITY is dependent upon the agreement and considerations of humans...
...THAT WOULD BE THE OBJECTIVE REALITY.
What are you up to here?