@gungasnake,
Quote:The evidence indicates that being in the process of being beaten to death was the main thing which influenced Zimmerman to shoot the guy.
No the physical evidence does not indicate that Zimmerman was, "in the process of being beaten to death." Zimmerman was not severely beaten--his injuries were rather minimal, and suggest only that he had sustained a blow to his nose and scraped the back of his head. And we don't know who provoked the altercation, and whether it was Martin who might have been trying to protect himself from Zimmerman. And, during the altercation, Zimmerman appears not to have defended himself in any manner other than by firing his gun. There are many unanswered questions, which are reasons this case is going to trial--to determine whether Zimmerman was legally justified in using deadly force, in self defense, in that particular situation.
And Zimmerman has given varying accounts of what influenced his decision to shoot Martin. I believe, in one version, it was because Martin saw and reached for his gun. Martin's DNA was not found on the gun.
The case will be decided only on the basis of the evidence--from both sides--that will be allowed and presented at trial. You don't yet know exactly what that evidence will be, and neither do I.
This case, because of its ambiguities, is exactly where it should be--in a courtroom, where a jury will consider the evidence presented to them and decide on a verdict. I'll decide on a verdict, in my own mind, after I hear that evidence and evaluate how persuasive it is.
I'm glad that the judge has decided to sequester the jury once the trial begins.