I need help translating this to LATIN!

I'll be happy to help.
What have you got for the first sentence?

George, can you help me. I didnt find a suitable place to post this question, but I take the liberty to squeeze it in here.
I woke up one morning with a phrase in my head that I belive is in latin, and I had the feeling I had to find out what it meant. The phrase was
"In Quasser" and I am prett sure this is how it is written. Of course I had only the phonetics in my mind but this is how I would spell it. I have an idea what it means but would like to have an expert have a look at it before I settle on a conclusion. Thanks.

To begin with, I am hardly an expert. I studied Latin and Greek in high
school and college. I just do this here for fun.

All I can determine about quasser is that it is a form of the verb quasso,
which means to shake violently or to break. Quasser would be the first
person singular, passive subjunctive meaning "May I be shaken" or "May I
be broken." In is the preposition in. I don't know why it would be
hanging out there without an object.

Sorry, that's all I got.

Thanks George. I had a feeling that it meant something like that. The story behind this is greater than I have told so far. I wouldn't tell too much in the beginning to avoid "contamination" of the response. But, let us assume that I know what the object in question is, and that the phrase was an answer or rather, as I suspect, a kind of prophecy of what will be the end result of that object in the future. Now, what do you think is most likely if I suggest three options. 1: A castle (a physical object) will be in ruins in the end (after being broken or shaken to pieces), 2: I (a person or being) will be shaken when all this is over, or 3: A religion (a group of peoples religious belief) will cease to exist because it is proven to be false. In short, could it be interpreted as an answer to a question I raise, or as a statement that should be interpreted as a prophecy? I understand if you are confused after all this. Thanks for your opinions.

Why is the verb present subjunctive? ("May I be shaken.")
Wouldn't the future indicative be used for a prophecy? ("I will be shaken.")

And what are we to make of "in" just standing out there?

I have no idea. But let me tell you about another one and how I solved it. I live in Finland, but I do not speak Finnish although I have had a couple of language courses. I was actually at one time trying to decide whether I should change religion. So I prayed to the heavenly father whether I should get baptized in that church or not (I was searching for the right church in a way). Again I had a phrase in my head the following morning - "veri tyhmintä" and I had to try to find out what it meant. I knew already that veri meant blood. But tyhmintä was a new strange word so I asked several Finnish people what it meant. They came up with "the most stupid" and in total "blood the most stupid". Now, stupid blood could mean blood cancer but it didn't make any sense at that time. But then I was trying to look for an answer in this phrase, and as you can imagine and to make a story short, I ended up with "bloody stupid" or "it is the most bloody stupid thing to do". This could be interpreted as an answer to my question. Although it seems a bit undivine answer it is clear and concise.
When it comes to "in", can it not have two meanings. E.g. "In the box" vs. "In Confusion" just to take an example. And what will the translation to Latin be for "I will be shaken"? Thanks.

"I will be shaken"
quassabor