Re: Condi Rice now agrees to meet with 9/11 commission
dyslexia wrote:just heard on MSNBC that Condi now requests to meet with the commission Privately and Not under oath.
Dr. Rice, the National Security Advisor, who is one of the most important public servants in the nation, has agreed to testify, but only:
a) In private
b) Without taking an Oath
This is intolerable.
I am still waiting for a rational explaination - no, fu
ck it,
any explanation - for this.
Every administration has a unique dynamic. What we know about the Bush administration indicates that five people - Rumsfeld, Powell, Cheney, Tenet, and Rice - exerted tremendous influence of Bush's decisions. Two of these people - Cheney and Rice - were particularly influential, in that they were charged with sifting through information and presenting Bush with what
they felt were reasonable policy options for him to choose from. Consider the comments of James Fallows, in an objective and comprehensive analysis he wrote in the Jan/Fed issue of Atlantic Monthly:
Condolezza Rice played a vital role in the decisions leading up to war. The fact that she is avoiding taking a vow, and avoiding testifying in public, is absolutely deplorable. Rarely have I seen such a blatent lack of accountability and transparency in government.
I can think of no reason she would refuse to take an Oath. Can anybody?
The obvious question is
why has she taken this route?