@OmSigDAVID,
David, I did answer some of your questions. We are a democracy, and certain proposals, for example compulsory ID cards, was not popular and never became law. If people think something's wrong they make a great song and dance of it, nobody's bothered about how the hate crime laws were being handled by the courts. Although there were some initial misgivings at the beginning, these fears appear to be unfounded.
How on Earth do you expect me to answer the multitude of questions you asked about what the judge was thinking? I don't have a clue what the judge was thinking and neither do you. I assumed your questions were all rhetorical.
Language should never be taken completely literally, the term everybody can be used to mean the prevailing public opinion in a country, it doesn't have to mean everybody on the planet. The French use the term Toute la Monde, the whole world, but it very rarely, if ever, means the whole world. Everybody (Toute la Monde) laughed at the comedian, just means the audience.
You know all of this though, you're just being obstinately pedantic and literalist in order to score a cheap point, and it's such a cheap point, none of the other points will give it the time of day.
(Leaving out what I saw in some Indian nations done by local police there.)
